samedi, septembre 25, 2004

Bill Perks

Deux interviews de Bill Wyman, dont l'une sur le site de François Bon :
L'autre, plus succinte :
Livre Du côté de chez Bill
propos recueillis par Pascal Dupont - L'Express du 12 juin 2003
Des centaines de photos inédites et de fac-similés d'articles des tabloïds anglais de l'époque accompagnent le texte du journal que Bill le Fantôme, surnommé ainsi pour sa grande discrétion, a minutieusement tenu pendant près de trente ans. Rolling with the Stones (EPA/Hachette), de Bill Wyman, le premier bassiste du groupe, est un formidable moment d'histoire. L'homme à la coupe de hallebardier du Moyen Age a quitté le groupe il y a près de dix ans. Pas rangé des camions pour autant, il continue à jouer avec ses Rhythm Kings, formation qui réinterprète des standards du bluesPour les tabloïds, les Stones étaient de dangereux voyous qui allaient précipiter la chute de l'Empire britannique...
La presse se focalisait sur ce qui paraissait scandaleux. Comme pour Chuck Berry à ses débuts, seulement célèbre pour avoir emballé une mineure et fait de la taule. Elle s'intéressait au fait que nous portions des haillons, ou ce qu'elle prenait pour tels. Au final, c'était quand même bénéfique: on parlait de nous. Le phénomène n'a jamais vraiment cessé. Dans la tournée actuelle, les médias se moquent méchamment des «Strolling Bones» [les os qui se traînent].
Pourquoi votre livre s'arrête-t-il si tôt, avant la fin des années 1960?
C'est le moment où l'on a travaillé le plus. Durant les trois premières années, jusqu'en 1965, c'était insensé. Les disques sortaient à flux tendu. Chaque jour, on enchaînait enregistrement de deux ou trois morceaux en studio, photos et interviews, la route pour se rendre au concert, et retour. On se couchait à 4 heures pour se lever à 7. Plus les tournées à l'étranger. Non stop. Cela s'est un peu calmé après, car on n'en pouvait plus. Au début des années 1980, on a fait quelques grands concerts. Puis plus de tournée pendant sept ans. Chacun travaillait en solo. On se disputait. J'avais moins de quoi écrire.
Vous rendez un bel hommage à Brian Jones, mort en 1969.
Les Stones étaient son groupe. Sans lui, ils n'auraient pas existé. C'est lui qui a choisi chaque musicien. Lui qui a défini notre style. Lui qui écrivait et téléphonait aux tourneurs, aux maisons de disques, aux magazines. Est-ce que je l'ai regretté à sa mort? C'est une autre affaire. Il pouvait se montrer charmant, magiquement inventif en studio, trouvant une ligne mélodique, ajoutant des instruments, comme les marimbas d'Under My Thumb, ce qui changeait toute la chanson. Mais il avait une autre face, noire. Il rendait fou.
Le livre rappelle que les Stones ont souvent eu des démêlés avec la police. Pas vous...
J'ai fumé comme tout le monde. Pris des amphétamines. Mais c'est tout. J'étais plus branché filles. Beaucoup, même. Et je n'ai jamais été pris, parce que je ne me laissais pas photographier. A Paris, par exemple, les autres se montraient chez Castel. Moi, j'allais dans un petit bistro.
Comment expliquez-vous qu'ils continuent?
Ils n'ont sans doute rien d'autre à faire.

KEITH RICHARDS - THE ORIGINAL PUNK - By Kris Needs

"Keith is the original punk rocker. You can't out-punk Keith. It's pointless."
So said Mick Jagger after the class of '76 exploded into the rock 'n' roll playground - and he was right.
Keith started laying down a punk blueprint while he was still at school. Despite subjecting his now 60-year-old body to a gamut of abuse and experiences, he's never wavered from being the no-nonsense music-crazy hoodlum that gets into trouble. He just got more famous, more out there and more revered as probably the greatest rock 'n' roll ever to stalk the planet.
There are countless tales of Keith's dedication to excess in the cause of being a self-appointed 'human laboratory'. Just as many about the absolute horror he struck into the hearts of 'decent' people the length and breadth of the land. The brushes with the law, drug busts, car crashes, fights and incidents clubbing unwanted invaders off the stage with his guitar. From refusing to go the silly revolving stage on 60s variety show Sunday Night At The London Palladium through being done for pissing in a garage forecourt to carrying a gun through New York's Lower East Side to cop heroin, Keith's been there and done that with more variations and on a scale few could imagine. On top of this, he has defined the role of rhythm guitarist and didn't earn the Human Riff tag for nothing.
Apart from their influence as the first dangerously anti-establishment band to come out of the 60s, the Stones' no-frills approach to spreading the gospel of the blues and playing vamped up teenage anthems set brand new precedents for rock 'n' roll. But apart from Keith's outlaw attitude, the Stones unwittingly became a motivating force for punk rock because of their very existence and the extravagance which gripped them in the mid-70s.
When the Stones played Earls Court in May '76, they were lambasted for their massive lotus stage, the appalling sound quality and hob-knobbing withPrincess Margaret backstage. The fact that the Earls Court gigs were huge, overblown and musically wretched added fuel to a gathering fire for some members of the audience who had their own bands, called the Sex Pistols and The Clash.
There was something new and scary germinating amongst London's young people at the time. The Pistols had already played their first gigs, boasting how Steve Jones had stolen some of their gear from the Stones' rehearsal space. The Pistols laid out a manifesto that was the opposite of luxury jets, lotus stages and albums that took over a year to record.
Most of London's burgeoning punk community attended Earls Court, and were incensed by the pantomime aspects of the show. The Clash wrote '1977', which declared, 'No Elvis, Beatles or the Rolling Stones in 1977' - despite the fact that their lead guitarist was one of London's most effectiveKeef-a-likes.
'Yeah, and no Sex Pistols in '78!' - Keith would cackle when asked about it.
Punk had an obvious effect on the Stones when they recorded their Some Girls album in late '77. Keith was now trying to come off smack, which was another reason for his full-tilt approach. The album was high-charged and not working-titled More Fast Numbers for nothing. Tracks like 'When The Whip Comes Down' were shot with rampant punk attack, except set in a New York fetish club instead of a tower block.The hidden influence of the Stones on punk was obviously enormous, apart from the obvious hatred from the older generation. As Keith says, Malcolm McLaren was, 'a half-assed Andrew Oldham' - referring to the Stones' original Svengali-style manager who engineered press outrage to gain the Stones notoriety.
Joe Strummer said that the first record that turned him on was the Stones' '63 single 'Not Fade Away'. Mick Jones razor guitar often came over like Keith-on-speed and he got a similar sound to Richards on tunes like 'Clash City Rockers'. In fact, the parallels between The Clash and the Stones were many and striking. The Strummer-Jones partnership could be as volatile as Jagger-Richards but produced some amazing music. Both bands wentto art school, loved American music like Chuck Berry and Bo Diddley and, when they toured the US, insisted that American black music legends support to remind the country of its own heritage. The Clash's at first misunderstood double album, London Calling, has been called their Exile On Main Street - the Stones' masterpiece from '72.
Punk attitude doesn't mean revisiting '77 and imitating Sid. It's in the way you live and approach life. That doesn't mean shouting in a squat, sniffing glue, or wearing the right uniform. It means staying true to yourself, not following the herd and, if necessary, living outside of the rules imposed by those who think they know. Keith's always done that. He's a family man these days but hasn't lost that fire and thirst for music and adventure.
Robert Johnson, Keith Richards, Joe Strummer, Andrew Weatherall, Pete Doherty...don't matter when you were born or what musical bucket you've plopped into. The attitude's what counts and what comes out of it. Even as a punk seeing The Clash every week, I never lost my respect for what the Stones had done, even when they were losing the plot. I'd been fanatically immersed since '63 and made interviewing Keith my top ambition when I started writing about music in the mid-70s and top priority when I took over as Editor of Zigzag. In 1980 the chance came after much pestering of press officers and now I've encountered him several more times up over the years. He's become a kind of long distance mate, which I find fairly surreal.
Last year, I realised another lifetime ambition and started writing a book about Keith. Easier said than done. It turned into a year-long obstacle course with problems like my mum getting ill, school holidays and a missionary zeal setting in which occasionally threatened my relationship with Michelle until I gave up the method acting. The fact I turned in more than double the amount of text required didn't help - and I still wasn't finished ! So what's coming out around now as Keith Richards - Before They Make Me Run [Plexus] has been very chopped about and changed with hardly any room for pictures. It's still just about my version of Keith's story and my relationship with him and his music though.
My first encounter with Keith in the flesh was shaking his hand after his trial at my local Aylesbury Crown Court for cocaine possession in '77. But I'll now hand over to myself in the book for an abridged account of our first interview...
'Our rendezvous was to be on Friday September 26, ['80] at Blake's Hotel, an exclusive and plush little establishment owned by former actress Anouska Hempel. The day after being summoned, I duly arrived at the pre-arranged time and was told to ring his room on the house phone.
"Hello", said a familiar-sounding voice.
Somewhat flutteringly, I announced myself.
"I'll be right down".
Two minutes later in strode Keith Richards, accompanied by Patti Hansen. Grey army sweater, black thatch, big grin and outstretched hand, all aboard that unique, loose-limbed amble.
"How ya doin', man?".
Not even seventeen years of immersion in everything to do with the Stones could prepare me for that first face-to-face meeting. But all nerves evaporated instantly with that first grin. There was no way I felt anything like an annoying gnat to be dispatched away as soon as possible - like I'd encountered with many a lesser so-called Rock Star.
"We'll do the interview at the Stones office", he announced, before a typical Keith afterthought. "Now I've just gotta find the car!"
We embarked on a bit of exploratory action around Kensington, while chatting away. I immediately felt at ease in his company and he was obviously deeply in love with Patti. He must be so used to awestruck fans, but didn't pull any play-acting or strops, and within minutes he was more like a mate. Didn't feel awestruck, just really fuckin' happy.
We traversed those high-class streets with a "I know it's round here somewhere" narrative from Keith., who was also explaining how they'd got back in the early hours that morning from Tramps night-club. Finally, we rounded into a leafy square, where we spotted the faithful Bentley. It's named 'the Blue Lena' after jazz singer Lena Horne, and she was halfway up the curb.
No chauffeurs here, and tales of Keith's gung ho approach to driving flashed through my head. Away we went! Through Kensington down to the Embankment, with Keith chatting away happily about what the Stones had been up to. By now it was approaching rush hour, so the traffic was fairly busy.
Suddenly Keith broke off the conversation.
"Oops, I'm going the wrong way!".
Without a second thought and at rather high speed, he launched into a tyre-shredding u-turn across three lanes of rush hour traffic, blowing kisses and waving regally at the gaping homebound motorists. There was much commotion and horn-parping, but we were soon heading the right way to Cheyne Walk, home of the Stones office.
We backed up to the front door and strode in. "Hi, darlin'", Keith greeted the receptionist, who was already reaching under her desk. "Jack Daniel's?" Out came the bottle and we headed up the stairs, with Keith leading the way to a comfy room, where we both slumped on a luxurious brown leather couch. Here, Keith commenced the emptying of both the Jack Daniel's bottles and my packet of Marlboros.
Keith in interview mode goes a bit like his driving - wherever it takes him. A languorous, cackle-peppered drawl, dotted with succinct comments and hilarious one-liners. That was the big surprise - and the one no one really bothers to tell you - this is one funny man. Keith's a past master of the swerve, but he released tantalising glimpses of a lot more going on in his life, brain and behind closed doors. Of his family life he was protective. Of his drug use astonishingly frank - in retrospect, after he'd knocked it on the head and had no fear of being busted again. About the group and music? Now you were talking.
My front page feature in the November, 1980, Zigzag led off with the following description, which still seems relevant today: 'The 1980 model Keith Richards is devoid of Rock Star flash, maturing like a caring, kindly old blues musician. But he still possesses an indefinable swagger that makes any of the preening idiots that still profess to be R 'n' R stars look the pathetic buffoons they really are."
That is the difference, and in many cases still is, between Keith and fellow musicians of a similar age group. He does what he wants to when wants to. He certainly won't stamp his foot and blow out a gig a few minutes before he's due on because some of the audience are smoking. I hate the phrase "down to earth" but Keith seems to revel in being as normal as possible with his wealth and fame, while still existing in, what experts call, "Keith time". No rules, no "petty morals" but, when you strip it down to the naked Keith, a major heart-grasping passion for the thing that got him going in the first place. Music.
He talked about Rolling Stones Records' star of the moment, Jim Carroll, from the East Village - the New York hotbed, which had also spawned Patti Smith, writer-musician Richard Hell, and a host of artists thriving under the original shadow cast by figureheads like the Velvet Underground and William Burroughs. Heroin had played a major role during this explosion, and Carroll's novel, The Basketball Diaries, was a brilliantly graphic account of the subterranean world which it ruled. Jim's debut album, Catholic Boy, was lined up to be released on Rolling Stones Records, trailered by the single, 'People Who Died'. This was essentially a role call of street acquaintances of Carroll's, who'd gone a hit too far.
Keith started laughing: "Yeah...I did a couple of numbers with him in New York, but I was drunk so 'yeah, alright!'. Actually Mick was supposed to join me but he chickened out at the last minute. Cunt."
Keith was fascinating company and a major laugh to interview. We swigged Jack from the bottle, leaned back and he simply soaked up my enthusiastic fan-type probings with relish before coming out with superbly insightful answers. He talked about the Stones' image.
'It gets impossible if you try and live up to it. We just do what we do and hope they like it. I mean, usually more and more you find that people come up with interesting ideas on an album a year later. Me too. It'll take that long to get a perspective on the last album. I'm too close to it right now. I've only just healed up from the last sessions! [laughs]. Beat me own record - nine days on a stretch! Once you get in the studio it doesn't really matter. It's timeless, like hibernation [snigger]. One tape op drops, you wake another one up!
'At this juncture I pointlessly came out with, 'So how d'ya keep awake then?' 'I dunno', smiled Keith. 'I can only do it when I'm working really.I've got a cycle of it by now. Normally I get up and I'll be up for two or three days, but when you're working...'
Really, with Keith, it's down to boredom thresholds crashing down. That's why he used to get back into serious heroin use when tours finished. Nothing else to do and energy to burn. He went on to bemoan the lack of decent venues in London but said he loved playing three-thousand-seater theatres in the States - "Kept us on our toes. It's a totally different way of playing." That one has grown and grown over the years.
Keith hated the 1976 'unfolding lotus' because he had to kick the set off with his "Honky Tonk Women" intro astride one of the petals. Not the most practical of ideas for the man who fell on his arse when he slipped on a stage-lobbed frankfurter [in Frankfurt!].
I must stress that, before the interview, I had made a mental note not to launch into tabloid-style 'Shocking Truth About Drug Fiend Keith' probing, unless he brought up this well scraped bone himself. The Canadian bust was only recent then and so much had been written on Keith's personal life it would've just seemed predictable and brainless to try and prise more juice out of his weary and battered reputation. On the other hand, heroin had been close to Keith's heart for years and he'd brought the subject up himself as our conversation gained steam. I mentioned how he'd always be lumbered with the rock 'n' roll junkie chic number. Another swig from the Jack - another of my fags - and that shaking-head grin. Keith's off for about the next twenty minutes on this one. Even though he's talked openly about his addiction from then until the present day, in 1980 this was the first time I'd encountered him being this candid anywhere.
So here's Keith on drugs...
'Yeah...I ain't gonna get rid of that one easy, am I? [Laughs] Maybe if I keep my nose clean as long as I kept it dirty they'll forget about it.'
I wondered if he still continued to get hassled about it.
'No...no. S'funny. [Leans forward and whacks table] Touch wood! It's like they've said, 'oh, we've had a go at him, he's done his bit, we'll leave him alone, he's kept his end up'...which I certainly didn't do for them. I did it for the Stones and for myself, the kids, whatever...'
Keith was plain angry with what he considered to be a concerted plan to bring down the Rolling Stones via repeated drug busts. It worked with Brian. They pried into his private-life, put all the dirt in lights then accused him of being a bad influence on the kids.
'Right,' he agreed, looking quite pissed off. 'Not only would you get done for what you got done for, you'd get done for setting a bad example. If they hadn't have come smashing through my front door no-one would've known what example I was setting! They made it public. Not me. I could understand it if I'd gone round saying "oh yeah, have a needle and a spoon, go off and have a good time, that's what it's all about." But I wasn't about to go round advertising it. They advertised it, then I had to pay for it. But fuck it, it happens to lots of people.'
I don't know how much the powers that be all work together or communicate with each other but it was like, how many more times would they have done me without it looking really like a bit of 'let's pick on him', y'know? I was an easy target. They knew I was on the stuff. They could've come round every day! That's why I eventually had to say 'no more'. I don't wanna see 'em any more. I was seeing more of cops and lawyers than I was of anybody else. To my mind, in the business of crime there's two people involved, and that's the criminal and the cops. It's in both their interests to keep crime a business, otherwise they're both out of a job. So they're gonna look for it. They ain't gonna wait for it to happen.'
By now, Keith was warming to his subject. He seemed to be letting out all his feelings about the last few years of smack domination, and was obviously proud of beating it. It had been some struggle. Having scanned all Keith's press, as a matter of keeping up with the Stoneses, I'd not encountered him opening up like this on the subject. He had the fire and determination of the man in denial who'd got there, and wanted the world to know, while also telling himself. Comment, observation, confession...call it what you want. He'd only been off the stuff completely for six months, so this was possibly the first interview he'd done clean for over ten years. It was Keith Richards talking about heroin, frankly and honestly, for twenty minutes straight. And in some little fanzine too!'
There's no way of writing about anything like that. It doesn't matter which way you angle it or state your case. Somebody's going to get turned on by it, Saying it's 'not chic', that means it's chic. If you said it was chic...there's no way of writing about it because it's such an emotional an sensitive subject. The main thing is, why, especially in this business, do people go onto it in the first place? What are the pressures? Is it the one guy above you that you dig the way he plays. Charlie Parker has done more to turn lots of horn-players into junkies just because it happened to be known. If people had left him alone, and nobody had known he was a junkie, maybe it would've been better. Why go searching out making sensational stories when you know that, just because the cops bust somebody if they're popular musicians or a superstar, there's gonna be somebody, no matter what that guy's going through himself, who's going to try and emulate it in some way?'
There's no right way about writing about heroin. There's plenty of wrong ways, and it's difficult to know. Ever since I kicked it, and cleaned up, I've been bombarded with requests and offers to make a statement about this, or address judges. I've been asked to do lectures for judges! The chance I've been waiting for - FUCK YOU! What else am I gonna say to them about dope? I'd just be embroiling myself and keeping myself in the same bag, attaching myself to the same thing that I'm trying to get rid of.
'Probably the only thing that might have any effect is, once everybody knows you're a junkie then yeah, you are an example. They've made you one, whether you wanna be, or not. So the only example I can be now is to say, 'yeah, I've done it for longer than most people, and luckily came out the other end, and I'm still here, and I'm alright. Even if you're into it already and you need to kick it, at least you know, because I'm still here. If you want to, you can kick it, and the sooner the better, darlin'.
'If there's one thing I can talk about more than music and guitars, I can talk about dope! It's like guns. There's nothing wrong with the gun. It's the people who are on the trigger. Guns are an inanimate object. A heroin needle's an inanimate object. It's what's done with it, that's important. I think of all these people doing it, and not even knowing what they're doing. That, to me, is the dumbest thing. At least, by the time I got on it, I knew as much as you can know.
'The one thing that I've realised more than anything since I kicked it, is that the criteria you use when you're on it is so distorted from what you'd use normally. I know the angle - waiting for the man, sitting in some godamn basement waiting for some creep to come, with four other guys snivelling, puking and retching around. And you're waiting for something to happen, and it's already been 24 hours, and you're going into the worst. How does it feel, baby? You don't feel great. If I was Joe Blow, maybe I'd still be on it, I dunno. I wouldn't take any notice of what I was saying if I was listening to it, or anybody else, cos when you're on it you don't.
'The only thing I can say is, if you want to, it's no big deal to kick it. Everybody wants to make like, 'oh, I've been to hell and back'. You've only been half way, baby. Nobody's been there and back. Anyway, here I am. Ten years I did it, and then I stopped, and I'm still 'ere. I've still got two legs, two arms luckily, and a bit of a head left, and that's about it. If examples count at all, that's the only statement I can make. I'm still here.
'In America it's even worse, because you have doctors coming on TV, discussions about the drug problem. These doctors...the more patients they get on methadone, the bigger federal grant they get, so it's in their interest. They tell people who've been on it a few months, a year, 'your body can't do without heroin, you'll need methadone forever'. Bullshit. You can kick it in three fucking days. That's as long as it stays in you. After that, it's up to you. I might oversimplify it in saying that, but that's the way it's always hit me. It's a physical thing for me in almost every way. If I can kick those three days...
"The other big problem is not cleaning them up, just sending 'em back. The same with me. The times I cleaned up and went straight back to exactly the same scene I was in before. What else you gonna do? You've been doing it for years. Everybody you know is doing it. You're kind of locked in. Unless you can break out of that circle afterwards...that's the next step. You're back in that same room as five years before, when you were on it, and they're still calling you up. Same people are coming around. It's a total drug, like total war. It takes over your whole life, every aspect of it eventually.
"I used to clean up to do a tour, because I just didn't want to be on the road, and have to be hassled. But, physically having to readjust when a tour just stops - [snaps fingers] - 'Now what do I do?' I'm physically readjusting to then going home and living a quiet family life for two months [!]. That'd do me in. Bom-bom, I'd go back on it. But if I had to work I'd clean up. But what a hassle! When you're on it you'll go through any hassle to get it. "First get me the dope, then I'll do what I have to do".
'Since then, Keith has refined his heroin overview. As this was his first interview off the gear, it was all coming off the top of his head, channelled from an awakened soul. The stupid tragedy on my behalf was listening enthralled as Keith opened his heart, taking it all in, then later doing the classic and diving in headfirst myself. Not because of Keith Richards, either. I became besotted with a female, who was besotted with heroin. Keith's words would often ring around my head...
One of Keith's scoring spots used to be the City's Lower East Side - same place and era as Johnny Thunders, who we met last month! Keith had been going there since the 70s. In those days, venturing East past Avenue A was totally off-limits to anyone who was white or not on dope. Avenue D stood for Death. Most of the buildings were burnt out, the streets were ruined and filthy, and practically unattended by cops. Simmering violence, imminent robbery and heroin etiquette ruled. The latter meant that you wouldn't think twice of ripping off someone you'd known for ten years. 'I carried a piece then.' And no fucking wonder. Go to all the trouble of scoring, then someonegrabs it back on the way out. 'You can't have that', muttered Keith.
What I'm getting at, is that Keith was venturing to the darkest, most dangerous, spots on earth to feed his habit. And, having been there myself, I can vouch that it is not self- mythologizing exaggeration when he describes these outings.
As you can imagine, by now the interview had quite loosened up. So, maybe we could talk about another delicate subject. Around that time I'd just read Up And Down With the Rolling Stones by Tony Sanchez - probably the most blatant muck raking cash-in on the Stones' dark side published to date. 'Spanish' Tony was Keith's minder during the height of his addiction and made sure he dished as much dirt as he could muster - homing in particularly on the drugs. It was recently published again with the new title, 'I Was Keith Richards Drug Dealer'. Keith emerges as a selfish junkie who changed his blood more often than his socks. The tabloids loved it, of course. By this time in our chat, I felt that I could mention it, and not get shot. But Keith dismissed the book with a grin and a shrug.
'Ohh...Grimm's Fairy Stories, yeah! Unbelievable, that. When it got to the blood change bit I thought 'oh, here we go!' Marvellous. 'Then he sprouted wings...' Actually, it wasn't him who wrote it, just some hack from Fleet Street. I'm the nasty, dirty, yellow schnide. Oh nice, Tony. thanks. You're my friend! Actually, it's quite clever. The actual incidents all happened, but then halfway through each chapter the description takes off into fantasy. This guy says Mick and I buried Brian, we made sure that nobody would ever see him again...but the guy's gotta make an angle or how ya gonna sell the book? The Fleet street hack thinks in terms of headlines. Spanish Tony had been with us for a long time, and a lot of the incidents in broad outline happened, but some of the details...I just gave up on the blood change! It's surprising the number of people believe all that. No doubt some people do it.
'That one came about like this. I'd been in a clinic in Switzerland. Spanish Tony came to help us move into a house. Tony asked, "What did they do to you up there?". I could hardly remember anyway and I'd only been in there about a week. I'd just crashed out virtually, went around puking in the ashtrays, ripping down the furniture and fittings for a couple of days and then I'd sort of got better, as usual. I couldn't explain all this to Tony so I said, 'Oh, they took all my blood out and gave me some fresh blood. All cleaned up!" Slowly over the years that one sentence has become one huge..."oh, the blood change, man", y'know? It's funny - one remark because you can't be bothered to explain and before you know it that's what you are. They probably wouldn't have sold any books without that.
When it was time to wind up proceedings, I flung in some remark about how Keith must be quite pleased how all this turned out, considering the humble origins, and how many kids like him start playing guitar just for fun.
'Yeah, right. That's what I thought when we had two gigs a week - "oh great! No more schlepping round this artwork trying to get a job in an advertising agency," and I chucked it. "I'm making a tenner a week, ain't I? I'm alright. As long as I don't break strings, or a valve goes in the amplifier, I'll come out with a fiver at the end of the week - be alright!"
So it was always like that. They just added more zeroes on the end as it went on, but as far as I'm concerned, it's the same attitude since we got our first gig: "Fine, great, wow! I'm doing what I really wanna do, and they're paying me to do it!"
And, on that note, a very pleasant afternoon drew to a close, along with the bottle of Jack Daniel's. Pleasant farewells were said, and I left the Stones office on a bit of a cloud. It's not every day you fulfil a lifelong ambition, and interviewing Keith had been more than I could have hoped for. I could look at and listen to the Stones in a different light, reflect on what exactly went into that latest creation.
I could also stagger off the train back home in Aylesbury with a Jack Daniel's grin on my face, fall into the local pub, raise a joyful fist, and bellow, 'Fuck me! I've just got pissed with Keith Richards!' And not have to buy another drink all night.
1983 came with an another close encounter with Keith. I'd taken over the editor's chair of a magazine called Flexipop! the year before. Up until then it'd been a forum for chart acts of the time like Soft Cell, Culture Club and Duran Duran. But they always tried to go for different angles than the usual 'favourite food', often with a somewhat perverted twist. Magazines like Smash Hits were selling bucket-loads, but there was only a number of ways you could apply twisted humour to someone like Simon Le Bon.
My first cover feature had been about The Clash, and I rattled off surreal bollocks on anyone and everything until the publishers - bless 'em - made me editor. This synthesised pop-pap needed raunching up, I thought. We started taking the piss relentlessly. One memorable issue featured a cartoon of a certain cross-dressing New Romantic icon naked in the shower while a psychotic pig tried to ram a salami up his tradesman's. The old queen was not amused.
I thought it would be a top move to put Keith in my new organ. After all, he was the epitome of rock 'n' roll, plus a lot of the new underground were copying his look and lifestyle - and often failing miserably. Let's have the originator! So I called then-Stones PR Alan Edwards and requested an interview.
Within weeks I got the call...Keith would be doing one interview - and he wanted it to be me. It turned out he'd seen the Zigzag piece and loved it. He wanted to hang out and talk some more. Well, I'll be the Devil's scrotum!
This time the venue would be his favourite Savoy Hotel in London. Around then, whenever he was in London, Keith booked the same suite as used by Frank Sinatra. He seemed to like the fact that the living room view was a brick wall - no spies! - and you could get round-the-clock Shepherd's Pie and Jack Daniel's.
When I arrived Keith was out shopping. So I sat chatting with Alan Edwards, who a few years later would find himself looking after Elton John instead. Ironic one that: Keith's had always found the self-important little crooner a pain in the arse, and incurred Elly's bitchy wrath when he later dismissed his work as "Songs for dead blondes".
Pretty soon the pair arrived. Keith was wearing his battle-grey designer jacket, white shirt and jeans. Even compared to our last meeting, he looked obscenely healthy and happy. When I thought back to the tragic figure in that court-room in Aylesbury only a few years before I glowed myself. This time Keith greeted me like an old mate with a massive hug, catch-up chat and prompt offering of a long line of in-flight refreshments. He happily posed for polaroids, even insisting on taking some himself. The interview went on for about three hours and the fun didn't stop there.
When the subject of punk rock came up, Alan Edwards, who had been butting into the interview to Keith's gathering irritation, added that only one band came out of the whole punk generation, which was still a fresh memory in '83. Yeah The Clash, I said automatically. 'Two then - the Stranglers and The Clash,' said Alan, who happened to be looking after the Stranglers at the time.
'The Clash and the Stranglers,' agreed Keith, democratically. 'And they're least punkish out of the whole lot! Compared to the Sex Pistols - because that's your definition of punk, right? Snotty little...pukey little...that's a punk, right? I've never understood why anybody would want to put that particular label on themselves and be proud of it. [Adopts sneering tone] A punk's a punk, hur hur! The phrase that still hangs on is New Wave, which came out at the same time. People still use it now. In a way it's more valid, because each wave that comes in...it doesn't really mean anything. New Wave? My next album - that's new fuckin' wave baby! It's the last thing I've done that's gonna hit the shore. Take it or leave it.'
He talked about the way the Stones' first manager Andrew 'Loog' Oldham thrust the group into the newspapers as a planned strategy, thus ensuring fame and notoriety.
'We had it down. That's where we learned it all from. That's why we'd turn up at the Savoy dressed in clothes where we knew we weren't gonna get in. You have to have a tie and a suit - 'specially in the early Sixties - to get in these places. We'd deliberately turn up and make sure there were a couple of photographers around. That is what it was based on. We played the game of manipulation of The Media. I mean, Malcolm McLaren is a half-assed Andrew Oldham."
'A Clockwork Orange' fascinated the Stones at the time and peppered Oldham's sleeve-notes for the early Stones albums: "Yeah, and I was into it as he was. We used to go round in his American car with his chauffeur-cum-bruiser and beat up people on the way. It was great fun. We'd build a brick wall in front of somebody's driveway in the middle of the night. Cement and everything - six foot brick wall...spend all night doing it. Especially if it was somebody that we'd made a phone call to who had to be in London at six o'clock in the morning. Whizz out of their stately home at five in the morning and bash straight into this brick wall built right across their driveway!".
Keith expounded on the way he presented himself to people while having to live up to his monstrous image. 'Thing is you're one of the Rolling Stones. You're Keith Richards Of The Rolling Stones and you play that game to a certain extent, because it's what you have to do. As long as I ain't bullshitted by being Keith Richards Of The Rolling Stones, I don't give a damn. I don't mind bullshitting other people! You want this Keith Richards? You want that Keith Richards? Then there's your Keith Richards! You know me better, even though we've only met a couple of times, cos I can talk to you, in a way that I'd never talk to [tabloid journalist] John Blake. I give him his version of Keith Richards. If I thought it served a purpose I'd stick him up against a wall and put a knife to his throat. And he'd write about it and get a scoop. I'd just need the opportune moment to do it. I don't see why I shouldn't. I'd dearly love to. And not just him either.'
After the interview it was time for some fun. 'Fresh supplies' were obtained and Keith greeted an ever-growing stream of visitors who'd heard he were in town. Soon it was like a mini-party in there.
At the time I was working at a Soho club called the Bat Cave, which was at the forefront of the burgeoning glam-goth movement. It eschewed the seriousness of the Gothic movement for silly fun and frolics with glam rock, disco, outrageous stage acts and the odd band. I tried to inject a rock 'n' roll element, which meant playing the Stones when I deejayed. I had to do so that night and, much to my surprise, Keith decided he was coming too. He went on about it for hours, deflecting incoming phone invitations from the likes of Pete Townsend with a sharp 'Nah, I'm going to the Bat Cave with Kris.'
Unfortunately, just as it was time to leave Keith's lawyer turned up and he had to have a meeting. 'Gimme a call from the club, I still might be able to make it', he said and scribbled down his room number plus 'Mr Hannay' - the alias he'd chosen for this particular stay. [Mr Hannay was a character in famous movie 'The 39 Steps'].
The whole club was buzzing about a possible visit from Keith. I called Mr Hannay about three hours later, from a pay phone situated right next to the dance-floor. He'd just finished his meeting and by now the party was in full swing, 'Come back for a night-cap,' he said. Still not quite believing all this, I returned to the Savoy for another ten hours of rampant imbibing, dub reggae and top Keef anecdotes. Unfortunately - and unsurpisingly - I can hardly remember any of them!
He did let me try on that legendary skull ring though, and also showed me the maker's catalogue. 'It's there to stop me getting big-headed and remind me that beauty is only skin deep. We all look like this under the surface.'
One thing I do remember is getting a crash course on [music hall comedian] Stanley Holloway, along with Max Miller. 'You've gotta hear this guy!' said Keith with a huge grin at about seven in the morning. At this point Keith started talking about his love of the great comedians. He didn't have much time for your non-funny Ben Elton-type wankers, but went on for ages about vintage music hall-era greats like Flanagan and Allan and the Three Stooges. And, of course, Tony Hancock and Tommy Cooper. He whacked on Stanley Holloway and knew every line: joining in, pointing and cracking up frequently at the gentle East End humour with piano accompaniment.
Quite a 24 hours, that. My first proper sesh with Keith and he was more than the perfect host. I was expecting an aching hooter and came out with splitting sides. Next day I went looking for a Stanley Holloway album and found a compilation called - wait for it - 'Brahn Boots'! I dug it out when I was writing this and, when I visited Keith twenty years later, before one of the 'Licks' gigs, gave it to him. 'Ah, great, Stanley!' he said with a cackle.
One night the following year, I was sitting at home one night in Wandsworth, South London. Funnily enough, by then I'd also hitched up with a girl from New York called Patti. We'd had a slight tiff, so I was feeling a bit low. Then the phone rang:
'Kris?' said a familiar voice.
'Yeah.'
'It's Keith here. I'm in town for a few days. Wanna come over for a drink? Savoy Hotel. Just you, right?'
Well, I'll be the Devil's Scrotum for a second time! Within minutes I was out of the door and on a 77 bus to The Strand. I suppose in a bit of a shocked condition. I have never maintained the male groupie mentality, but it isn't every night that you get a phone call from your all-time musical hero inviting you over for a drink. Interviews are fine if you get on - as had happened on our previous encounters - but they're an arranged scenario. Here I was going for a sesh, at the man's invitation.
I duly arrived at the front desk in the auspicious foyer and gave the password name, which could've still been Mr Hannay. It was the same suite as before. Knocked on the door. A grinning Keith answered himself. Expecting a full-blown party to be in full swing I was quite surprised to find him on his own, apart from a guy called Alan Clayton. He turned out to be the singer in the Dirty Strangers, which Keith had enthused about on our previous meeting.
The Dirty Strangers were a London-based band who had been playing blues-based rock 'n' roll around the pubs and clubs for years. The Dirties proudly flew the rock 'n' roll flag in those New Romantic times, mainly playing the pub circuit. A chaotic but hugely enjoyable knees-up. Decidedly un-trendy, they seemed to remind Keith of his early days. Alan had met Keith in '81 through a mutual friend called Joe Seabrook, who was his minder - they'd been nightclub bouncers together.
When Keith was visiting London during the period when Mick was busy, he wanted to hang out with mates. Alan had been up to the Savoy several times already, even though he was working on a building site at the time, and sometimes had to go to work straight from an all-nighter with Mr Richards!
Keith had a problem. He was due to fly to Jamaica the next day and, being Keith Richards, could not board the plane with the bag of killer weed and added extras someone had left in the room. 'Our mission tonight is...' There were also several bottles of Jack Daniel's lined up.
So in we went and I embarked on one of the most remarkable nights of my life. I wouldn't say memorable! Refreshments were broken out and, within an hour, we were chatting, joking and, it must be said, giggling a lot. The three of us approached our consumable-obliterating task with gusto. As ever, Keith's mighty boom-box was blasting out the dub and it struck me how relaxed he was. Away from the press officers, assistants, hangers-on, and with no microphone in front of him. Jokes were exchanged of a toilet nature and the music hall tapes came out.
Keith has been portrayed as many things, and I've always found him friendly and accommodating when doing the interviews. But here he was just hanging out with the boys and having a laugh. It's an old cliche, but he could have been a top bloke you'd met down the pub. It was like, in a life nobody could call normal, Keith Richards could unwind in his home town without any outside pressure, hassle or duty to perform.
But it was inevitable that the guitars would come out. I was sitting about three feet away as Keith picked up a large Gibson accoustic and started picking some mean and lowdown blues. He used it to punctuate his words as he talked. Close up, Keith's guitar style is awesome. He goes on about how he'd stand next to Jerry Lee Lewis and have to stop playing as his jaw hit the floor. I wasn't playing anything - can't! - but that didn't stop my own chin crashing into the carpet as Keith closed his eyes and let fly into his own personal heaven. Chords richocheted between scattershot flourishes and fills, delivered with either brutal power or gentle affection. He struck, stroked and steered the instrument with a sublime motion that goes way beyond mere skill. For those minutes Keith was in the dark heart and soul of the original blues. No wonder his hero is Robert Johnson. When Keith first heard the music of the blues' greatest legend, he asked Brian Jones who the other guitarist was. If this had been a record, I would have been asking who were the other two, although occasionally he'd simply twist your heart with one solitary groin-snarling note.
At Keith's insistence, Alan played one of his songs. Looking a trifle nervous - who wouldn't? - he acquitted himself just fine with 'Gambler's Blues'. And got a round of applause back.
Next it was Keith's turn again. It couldn't be. Fuck me if it wasn't. 'Wild Horses'. Five minutes later Keith and Alan were still trying to scrape me off the ceiling.
The night went on. A bit of Max Miller, fresh supplies of Jack, more strumming, more of everything, until at around six in the morning Keith came out with his own piece d'resistance. Mischievous gleam in his eye, he bounded over to the phone and dialled room service. 'Just you wait until you try this!'
Soon the trolley turned up, the porter wheeled it in, receiving a twenty pound note for his trouble and Keith unveiled...shepherd's pie! With peas.
Over the years, the man's obsession with shepherd's pie has become legendary. In 1984 it was a littler known fact, but he was obviously already a connoisseur as we stuffed ourselves. It was probably half the reason he stayed at the Savoy! It was certainly top of the list of things he missed most in the UK, along with PJ Tips teabags and brown sauce.
As the sun began to stream in through the window, Keith tottered into the bedroom and commenced a phone call which went on for over an hour. It must've been to Patti, as he chuckled contentedly and spoke low and affectionately, with a massive smile on his face. Eventually, he came off the phone, walked in, and looked around. 'Aah, fuck the plane!' and we started again. Only for a while though. We were all drifting off. Me and Al said our warm goodbyes, with Keith telling me to call him the next day to see if he was still around.
Next day I called the Savoy from a phone box in Tooting, where I had just been to sign on. Got through to Keith immediately, who was laughing. We swapped 'good night, wunnit?' type chat, but he couldn't meet up. Keith was finally going to make that plane.
We met again in '92 when Keith was on the road with his side project, the X-pensive Winos. I'd recently started hanging out with well-known Stones aficionados Primal Scream and it was a well-oiled rabble that caught the 'secret' gig at London's old Marquee club, then another show at the Town &Country on 18 December. Both were belters, Keith in total control, stalking the stage like a panther, chords crackling out of his hands, which occasionally flew off his guitar in visual counterpart. Stripped of the Stones' excessive trappings it was a pure punk rock jolt and his version of 'Gimme Shelter' froze the blood. At the after-show party in the upstairs bar, our Scream Team, who had ushered proceedings along with a few happy pills, occupied the next table to Keith's family - proud dad Bert, missus Patti and son Marlon. Having met them before I made some cheery greeting, but they probably wondered who this bunch of lunatics were.
Then Keith, who was celebrating his 49th birthday, staggered in clutching a pint glass of vodka with a hint of orange. To my total surprise,he spotted me, grinned and made a convoluted beeline through the clamouring music biz mob to our table. He gave me a bear hug and 'How ya doin', man? Long time no see.' I wished him happy birthday. Of course, he was soon shepherded away into the throng, but that made my night. And you should have seen the look on Primal Scream's faces. They went back to the studio, where they were supposed to be recording what became Give Out But Don't Give Up and continued the party until morning, in Keith's honour [Any excuse!].
Last time I saw Keith was during the 2003 'Licks' tour. Global affirmation of the Stones longevity and ability to still do it like nobody else. I'd started knocking about with Alan Clayton again, who showed me this amazing gift Keith had given to him - the Gibson Hummingbird on which he wrote many of the Stones' late 60s classics. Alan went on some of the 'Licks' tour as Keith's travelling companion and was inspirational while I was writing the book.
My 40 years of following the Stones came full circle when me and my girlfriend Michelle went to see them at Wembley Arena that September. Alan had said he'd ask Keith if we could come back and say hello. When we got to the gig Alan found us and said 'Follow me'. He'd had a word with Keith and it was alright to pop back and see him while support band The Darkness squeaked away. Led by we went through a few doors, up a corridor and into what turned out to be Keith's dressing room.
Big sound system, low lights and a well-stocked fridge. Vic Reeves and his girlfriend lurking in the corner. Michelle walked in and took her shoes off. She was nervous about meeting him for the first time. 'No need,' I'd already said.
When we walked in Keith was in the centre of the room in conversation with a guy making a biopic of Gram Parsons. It was already surreal but very chilled.
Keith ambled over, hand extended, big grin. The usual 'How ya doin', man?' and bear hug. People have said you don't see Keith for years, then you do and it's like you saw him last week. He looked great, in a green military-style jacket, black bandana and stuff swinging about in his hair.
I introduced him to Michelle. 'Hi darling,' he said, as he kissed her hand with a gentlemanly flourish. Her nerves evaporated. Soon, Ronnie Wood came bouncing in, accompanied by his old mate Jeff Beck. A few minutes later Patti Hansen showed up. It turned into the best twenty-minute party I've ever been to.
It was great seeing him again, and he signed my programme '20 years on, one love'. We chatted a bit. He didn't really have to fill me in on what he'd been up to over the years, so I told him some of the incidents that had gone on my end. We agreed that smack was best left behind now. I can't believe how relaxed and friendly the atmosphere was. But it was one of those blurry, dream-like moments that go in a flash.
Then it was approaching show time so Keith and Ronnie had to getchanged. Cheery goodbyes as they hopped up and down into their stare stridesand Mr Clayton led us off on the nearest cloud. When Michelle left she asked Keith if she could give him a kiss. He obliged with a hug thrown in.
The Stones' set was an electrifying charge through some of their greatest moments and we were in the thick of the crowd near the stage. One of the best gigs I've ever seen and one of those nights you cherish forever.
So I've finished the Keith book and now I'm doing Joe Strummer and The Clash. A totally natural progression, if you ask me. The connecting word is greatness.
Kris Needs - tMx 15 - 06/04

Précision

Ce weblog a surtout pour but que de me permettre de conserver accessibles mes fichiers d'interviews des Stones & alentours.... Ce n'est pas un weblog public à proprement parler.
[EDIT (août 2006) : je me demande pourquoi j'avais écris un truc aussi faux-cul à l'époque (sûrement la timidité), de toutes façon le but annoncé est largement raté vu le nombre de personnes qui sont passées par ici. S'abonner à un site de stats vous fait perdre quelques illusions sur la question... A propos, admirez la vitesse à laquelle le langage évolue, j'ai failli ne pas comprendre ce qu'était un weblog à la relecture].

dimanche, septembre 05, 2004

Keith Richards - Dimitri Ehrlich décembre 2002


Keith Richards: forty years on, here's a career that doesn't need botox
Music—The Coolest - Interview

From his days as a teenager developing a religious devotion to American R&B and blues to his time as a drug-addled star, Keith Richards has not only continued to make great music, he's also developed a mythic persona that all rock guitarists have followed ever since. Richards created the blueprint for the mysterious guitarist, a piratical warrior with an effortless gift for being devilishly cooler than the front man (in the Rolling Stones' case, himself pretty cool). The Stones' current world tour--coinciding with the recent release of Forty Licks (Virgin), a 40-track hit list charting their career--attests to Richards' undiminished powers for conjuring graceful, guttural sounds. In person he's weathered, degenerate, wise, bemused, sweet, and a force of nature.
DIMITRI EHRLICH: Why are you still going?
KEITH RICHARDS: It's still getting better. We haven't played together for three years, basically since the last tour, yet every time we get back together there's this extra juice that makes people feel good about playing. That's the important thing: You can't take this gig on and think, I'm just going to grind it out, because you'll grind yourself out. You've got to be looking forward to something, and morale right now is very good. Sometimes I wonder, Am I working for the audience, or am I working for myself?
DE: Do you often think about the larger questions--about what your purpose is?
KR: [laughs] Well, there's the great mystery, isn't it? Basically, all I know is that in order to do what I do--turn people on--the band needs to be turned on first. It has to do with being part of a team. If you're going through the motions, thinking [in a funny voice], They're looking to be impressed by my expertise, you might as well be a plumber or a CEO.
DE: It's not about money or acclaim, then?
KR: We never wanted to be pop stars. We were thinking more about jazz. Of course, we realized that wouldn't work if we wanted to get into a recording studio. Fame isn't something where you just sort of go, "OK, I'll be famous!" and take the ticket. When it happens, you'd better grab it. In the end, being pop stars was handy; you realize you could do a whole lot more from this position. Suddenly it wasn't so unhip to be a pop star. [laughs] Twist my arm. We're still here because we're not forcing it. There's just some compulsion to follow this thing.
DE: Your grandfather was the person who initially encouraged you to learn the guitar. Did he get to see his encouragement pay off?
KR: Oh yeah, he didn't die until the '70s. He gloated for a long time. As a kid I would go up and visit Grandpa for a couple of weeks; when I got there, there'd always be this Spanish guitar, a really beautiful old gut-string job, on the wall. I'd look at it and he'd go, "You can play it when you can reach it." I waited years. He was a very musical man. He played violin, sax; he had a band of his own until just before he died. He never stopped. He just turned me on in such a subtle way. I'd visit one of his guitar workshops or musical stores--you know, where the repairs are coming in, violins, guitars, saxophones. He'd buy me a few picks and I'd be sitting on the chair at six or seven, legs dangling, watching these guys coming in with guitars, or guys from the orchestras going, 'You must help me!" And I'm just observing this sort of alchemy go on. He brought me up without me even realizing it. Maybe it wasn't his plan.
DE: In Brian Eno's diary he wrote that you can never really rely on drugs or drink to improve your creative process. But the fact that you wrote "Satisfaction" and then passed out, and probably wrote many songs while quite buzzed, would suggest otherwise.
KR: It's impossible to say what I would have written if I wasn't [inebriated]. At the time I wrote "Satisfaction" it wasn't anything serious, you know? A few uppers and a bit of weed. When I listen to what I did under the influence--10 years of work--I don't think it either enhanced or impaired me. It didn't have that much to do with it. Some guys think dope is great for their music. Bullshit! I took drugs because I wanted to hide.
DE: You wanted to hide away.
KR: Life was just too bloody public, and that was the only place where I could handle it and be in my own cocoon. I was with an old lady who agreed with me [about drug use], so it was quite easy. Eventually you realize it's self-defeating- especially heroin. You think your scene is really cool as long as you've got the shit. No matter what you have to go through, you're like, 'Oh, it's cool. I've got to go score, honey. I'll be back." You go into this very heavy situation and take it for granted, but you might as well be in a war zone. You're more likely to get shot [scoring drugs] than in the front lines.
DE: I read that when you got busted in Toronto in February 1977. one of the reasons that you didn't go to jail was because some blind girl went up and testified to a judge that you helped her get home after a Stones concert. Is that right?
KR: I met this blind chick from Montreal on the road in the States. She was going to every Stones gig, hitchhiking blind as a bat to get to the next concert. I said, "This is not safe," so I would fix her up a ride with the truckers; I thought, She's going to do it anyway, and I didn't want her to get run over. And that's all did. This [drug arrest] case dragged on for a year and a half or more, and the Canadians wanted it out of their hair. But this chick actually went to the judge's house one night. She knocked on his door, told him the story, and from that he saw his way clear. These are my blind angels! [laughs] I'm blessed this way.
DE: I interviewed you about eight years ago and asked if you ever had trouble falling asleep, and you said, "No, I never go to bed. I just keep going until I pass out." Is that still true?
KR: Yeah. I still don't go to bed to go to sleep. Usually it overtakes me sooner or later, but basically that's true. Even if I've got to get up in the morning, I'll average it out and say, "Well, I've been up too long and I've got to get up in three hours." In that case I'll go through rather than get three hours' sleep. Forget about it. Otherwise I don't regulate it. It seems to work out.
Dimitri Ehrlich is Interview's Music Editor at Large.
COPYRIGHT 2002 Brant Publications, Inc.COPYRIGHT 2002 Gale Group

Keith Richards - octobre 2002

October 6, 2002
Keith Richards: Interview with Stones guitarist

Keith Richards bolts out of the dark and into the light, grips the neck of his guitar like a rifle barrel and fires the opening call to joy of the Rolling Stones' 2002-03 world tour: the fierce chords of "Street Fighting Man," a blazing rush that for Richards is the sound of life itself.
"My biggest addiction, more than heroin, is the stage and the audience," he says with gravelly cheer the next day, after that first show in Boston. "That buzz -- it calls you every time." Richards, Mick Jagger, Charlie Watts and Ron Wood will spend the next year on the road answering that call, celebrating forty years as a working band and the release of a two-CD retrospective, Forty Licks. "You're fighting upstream against this preconception that you can't do this at this age," snaps Richards, who turns fifty-nine on December 18th. He has been through worse: a long dance with heroin in the 1970s; close calls with the law and death; his volatile lifelong relationship with Jagger. And Richards talks about all of it -- as well as his ultimate jones, playing with the Stones -- in this interview, conducted over vodka and cigarettes during two long nights in Boston and Chicago.
"People should say, 'Isn't it amazing these guys can move like that? Here's hope for you all,'" he says with a grin. "Just don't use my diet."
How do you deal with criticism about the Stones being too old to rock & roll? Do you get pissed off? Does it hurt?
People want to pull the rug out from under you, because they're bald and fat and can't move for shit. It's pure physical envy -- that we shouldn't be here. "How dare they defy logic?" If I didn't think it would work, I would be the first to say, "Forget it." But we're fighting people's misconceptions about what rock & roll is supposed to be. You're supposed to do it when you're twenty, twenty-five -- as if you're a tennis player and you have three hip surgeries and you're done. We play rock & roll because it's what turned us on. Muddy Waters and Howlin' Wolf -- the idea of retiring was ludicrous to them. You keep going -- and why not? You went right from being a teenager to being a Stone -- no regular job, a little bit of art school. What would you be doing if the Stones had not lasted this long? I went to art school and learned how to advertise, because you don't learn much art there. I schlepped my portfolio to one agency, and they said -- they love to put you down -- "Can you make a good cup of tea?" I said, "Yeah, I can, but not for you." I left my crap there and walked out. After I left school, I never said, "Yes, sir" to anybody. If nothing had happened with the Stones and I was a plumber now, I'd still be playing guitar at home at night, or get the lads around the pub. I loved music; it didn't occur to me that it would be my life. When I knew I could play something, it was an added bright thing to my life: "I've got that, if nothing else."
Do you have nightmares that someday you'll hit the stage and the place will be empty -- nobody bothered to come?
That's not a nightmare. I've been there: Omaha '64, in a 15,000-seat auditorium where there were 600 people. The city of Omaha, hearing these things about the Beatles -- they thought they should treat us in the same way, with motorcycle outriders and everything. Nobody in town knew who we were. They didn't give a shit. But it was a very good show. You give as much to a handful of people as you do to the others.
Do you have a pre-gig ritual -- a particular drink or smoke?
I have them anyway [laughs]. I don't go in for superstition. Ronnie and I might have a game of snooker. But it would be superfluous for the Stones to discuss strategy or have a hug. With the Winos [his late-Eighties solo band], it was important. They were different guys; we only did a couple of tours. I didn't mind. But with the Stones, it's like, "Oh, do me a favor! I'm not going to fucking hug you!"
At the height of your heroin addiction, would you indulge before a show?
No. I always cleaned up for tours. I didn't want to put myself in the position of going cold turkey in some little Midwestern town. By the end of the tour, I'm perfectly clean and should have stayed sober. But you go, "I'll just give myself a treat." Boom, there you are again. Could you tell that you played better when you were clean? I wonder about the songs I've written: I really like the ones I did when I was on the stuff. I wouldn't have written "Coming Down Again" [on 1973's Goat's Head Soup] without that. I'm this millionaire rock star, but I'm in the gutter with these other sniveling people. It kept me in touch with the street, at the lowest level.
On this tour, you're doing a lot of songs from "Exile on Main Street" -- for most people, the band's greatest album. Would you agree?
It's a funny thing. We had tremendous trouble convincing Atlantic to put out a double album. And initially, sales were fairly low. For a year or two, it was considered a bomb. This was an era where the music industry was full of these pristine sounds. We were going the other way. That was the first grunge record. Yes, it is one of the best. Beggars Banquet was also very important. That body of work, between those two albums: That was the most important time for the band. It was the first change the Stones had to make after the teeny-bopper phase. Until then, you went onstage fighting a losing battle. You want to play music? Don't go up there. What's important is hoping no one gets hurt and how are we getting out. I remember a riot in Holland. I turned to look at Stu [Ian Stewart] at the piano. All I saw was a pool of blood and a broken chair. He'd been taken off by stagehands and sent to the hospital. A chair landed on his head. To compensate for that, Mick and I developed the songwriting and records. We poured our music into that. Beggars Banquet was like coming out of puberty.
The Stones are reviving a lot of rare, older material on this tour, such as "Heart of Stone" and "Can't You Hear Me Knocking." Why did you stop playing those songs?
Maybe they were songs that we tried once or twice and went, "That didn't work at all." I think we tried "Knocking" once the whole way through. When the actual song finished and we were into the jam, it collapsed totally. The wheels fell off. We tried it one other time -- "We'll just do the front bit" -- and neither satisfied us. Nobody wants to go near something that has a jinx on it. But you have to take the jinx off, take the voodoo away and have another look.
Are there Stones hits that you're sick of playing?
No, they usually disappear of their own accord. That's the thing about songs -- you don't have to be scared of them dying. They keep poking you in the face. The Stones have always believed in the present. But "Jumpin' Jack Flash," "Brown Sugar" and "Start Me Up" are always fun to play. You gotta be a real sourpuss, mate, not to get up there and play "Jumpin' Jack Flash" without feeling like, "C'mon, everybody, let's go!" It's like riding a wild horse.
The general assumption about the Stones' classic songs is that Mick wrote the words and you wrote the music. Do you deserve more credit for the lyrics -- and Mick for the music?
It's been a progression from Mick and I sitting face to face with a guitar and a tape recorder, to after Exile, when everybody chose a different place to live and another way of working. Let me put it this way: I'd say, "Mick, it goes like this: 'Wild horses couldn't drag me away.'" Then it would be a division of labor, Mick filling in the verses. There's instances like "Undercover of the Night" or "Rock and a Hard Place" where it's totally Mick's song. And there are times when I come in with "Happy" or "Before They Make Me Run." I say, "It goes like this. In fact, Mick, you don't even have to know about it, because you're not singing" [laughs]. But I always thought songs written by two people are better than those written by one. You get another angle on it: "I didn't know you thought like that." The interesting thing is what you say to someone else, even to Mick, who knows me real well. And he takes it away. You get his take. On Stones albums, you tend to sing ballads -- "You Got the Silver," "Slipping Away," "The Worst" -- rather than rockers. I like ballads. Also, you learn about songwriting from slow songs. You get a better rock & roll song by writing it slow to start with, and seeing where it can go. Sometimes it's obvious that it can't go fast, whereas "Sympathy for the Devil" started out as a Bob Dylan song and ended up as a samba. I just throw songs out to the band.
Did "Happy" start out as a ballad?
No. That happened in one grand bash in France for Exile. I had the riff. The rest of the Stones were late for one reason or another. It was only Bobby Keys there and Jimmy Miller, who was producing. I said, "I've got this idea; let's put it down for when the guys arrive." I put down some guitar and vocal, Bobby was on baritone sax and Jimmy was on drums. We listened to it, and I said, "I can put another guitar there and a bass." By the time the Stones arrived, we'd cut it. I love it when they drip off the end of the fingers. And I was pretty happy about it, which is why it ended up being called "Happy."
How do you and Mick write now?
Take "Don't Stop," for example, one of the four new songs on "Forty Licks." It's basically all Mick. He had the song when we got to Paris to record. It was a matter of me finding the guitar licks to go behind the song, rather than it just chugging along. We don't see a lot of each other -- I live in America, he lives in England. So when we get together, we see what ideas each has got: "I'm stuck on the bridge." "Well, I have this bit that might work." A lot of what Mick and I do is fixing and touching up, writing the song in bits, assembling it on the spot. In "Don't Stop," my job was the fairy dust.
What would it take for the Stones to have hit singles now, the way you churned them out in the 1960s and 1970s?
I haven't thought like that for years. "Start Me Up" surprised me, honestly -- it was a five-year-old rhythm track. Even then, in '81, I wasn't aiming for Number One. I was into making albums. It was important, when we started, to have hits. And it taught you a lot of things quickly: what makes a good record, how to say things in two minutes thirty seconds. If it was four seconds longer, they chopped it off. It was good school, but it's been so long since I've made records with the idea of having a hit single. I'm out of that game.

Keith Richards - Books 2001

THE FIRST TIME I INTERVIEWED KEITH RICHARDS, he delivered A long encomium to America—how the blues and rock & roll records he'd heard as a teenager made him long to come here, how this country is like a whole world in itself, how America's freedom from tradition made it so much more open to new ideas than Europe. He had only one reservation. "
The one thing that really disturbs me about America," he said, after taking a pull on the Rebel Yell and ginger ale concoction he was drinking, "is that people don't like to read."
He suffused that statement with a combination of pity and befuddlement, as if the very notion was incomprehensible to him. Reading was like a song, he explained, the highest praise he could possibly offer. They both give "your imagination room to move."
And what does he like to read? His library, tucked into a dark corner of his rural Connecticut home, is a testimony to eclecticism. At the moment, he said, he was reading James A. Michener's Alaska.
"I didn't know anything about the place, but at least now I know a little bit," he said. "The last author I read was Dostoevsky. I like Dashiell Hammett, who I think is a brilliant writer. And Raymond Chandler. I read, like, four books at once," he concluded, laughing.
"Where's my book? Oh, I can't find that one, so I pick another one up. I read everything. It's about the same as what do I listen to. I listen to Mozart, and I listen to AC/DC."

For more photos and information on Keith Richards' private collection of books, see the complete article, "Gimme Shelter," in the July/August 2001 issue of BOOK. Call 1-800-317-BOOK to subscribe or to order a back issue.

Keith Richards - 1998

The Keith Richards interview by Dean Goodman
The following interview took place on Saturday, Oct. 17. Keith called me at my place from his Connecticut estate at 3 p.m. EDT sharp, as had been arranged by the band's publicist. Usually when rock stars call, they have assistants to make the initial contact, and then they put the rock star on the line. But Keith is evidently a do-it-yourself type. The interview was scheduled to take 10-15 minutes, but he was still going strong after 45 minutes. He'd had a rough game of dominoes the night before with his father, Bert, and was very relaxed. Usually he's hard to understand and speaks in soundbites, which he repeats to every reporter. Hopefully this interview is a bit more original than most. Unfortunately he didn't know much about the 1999 tour, and he sounded sincere in his ignorance. He was scheduled to fly to Toronto on Monday (19) to talk turkey with Michael Cohl. That portion of the interview -- and lots more juicy stuff -- will feature in the next issue.
Dean: This album seems more a collection of live songs than an actual concert album. Is that a deliberate attempt to escape that concert album rut?
Keith: Well I suppose so. In a way, when you're doing a live album, you kind of have to approach it in the same way that you approach doing a live show. What are you aiming for? With the stage, we've always been trying to figure out new ways to get out ... If you're in a football stadium stuck down one end all the time, it's a little restricting. It's always how to get out there. In a way, having developed a second stage thing, which I think has really given a whole new "spacial" feel to what you can do, then you approach the record in the same way. In actual fact, you look for the best takes of the songs, and get the different feels from different places. I believe it's definitely the best sounding live Stones record there is. People always throw "Ya-Ya's" at you, which was damned good spirit, but sound-wise it was early days. I think with a bit of luck people might agree this is "Ya-Ya's," but better recorded, y'know?
Most of the songs come from Amsterdam. Does that mean the Amsterdam shows were the best for you?
I tell you what, not necessarily, only that it was a controlled atmosphere. It was the first dome in Europe, and so we didn't have to deal with the weather. What happens when you're recording live, everybody gets to know the room over 4 or 5 shows, and you can hone it down. You have virtually a controlled environment. You weren't dealing with the rain or the wind. Sometimes you can get good tracks, but you don't want to chance your luck too much! It was a pretty lousy summer in Europe!
Isn't it weird starting with "You Got Me Rocking", which we all know comes from the B-stage?
We were under certain restrictions from the record company as to what tracks they didn't want -- tracks that had been on the previous 4 or 5 live albums. It made us hop around and bring up a different set list: not another "Jumpin' Jack Flash," as good as it is and I enjoy it on stage. We had to come up with a more eclectic list of songs. "You Got Me Rocking" now is a pretty good statement. What interested me about it is that Mick suddenly loved the song on this tour, and I could barely get him to record it for Voodoo Lounge! He wasn't interested in it at all then. You live and learn.
Do you feel proprietorial toward your own songs? You'll lobby for, say, "You Got Me Rocking" and Mick will say, ok, as long as I can have "Anybody Seen My Baby"?
No, not that way. I really consider them to be all collaborations. The only ones I don't are probably the ones that I do sing myself, and there are others that Mick has written himself as well. But otherwise, I don't really think about it that way. I've considered that my main task is to write things that I know that Mick can really get into, even if he doesn't believe it when I first lay it on him! Sometimes it takes a while. To me, "You Got Me Rocking," it does rock. The band plays so well. It never stopped every night. I was so impressed with everybody.

Keith Richards - décembre 1997

PATRICK CONNOLE in New York meets the embodiment of rock'n'roll. And survives ...

Many years have passed since Keith Richards was to have left this Earth. The toll of living the rock 'n' roll dream for 35 years as co-head of the Rolling Stones would cut short his life, many said. Others, simply looking at the man, wondered how he survived the 1960s, much less the decades that followed. But here it is 1997, and the Rolling Stones, with Richards on board as ever, are again playing to full stadiums on their savagely promoted "Bridges to Babylon" tour. Like an anxious comet, the Stones streak onto an increasingly barren world stage every three years, taking their place as the World's Greatest Rock 'n' Roll Band. Looking every inch the rock icon, the wiry, chain-smoking guitarist spoke at length about his life as a Rolling Stone and the effort it takes to keep the band together. First, he tried to answer the question he calls unaswerable: Why continue playing well into your 50s? "Why not? I don't know if it's just to do with rock 'n' roll or if it's inverted racism in a way. If I happened to be black, if I was Muddy Waters (a Stones mentor) or John Lee Hooker or Louis Armstrong, Count Basie, Ray Charles, nobody would even bring that (age) up," Richards said. "You'd think that us still playing would be a positive thing. For 20 odd years we've had to fight the question of how long can you go on. That's our question as well. It's not that we have the answer, but we can go on long enough. The band's rocking, and they're loving what they're doing." Richards espouses a live-and-let-live philosophy about his life's work, stressing that the Stones are enjoying their never-ending road show now more than ever. "If you set it up and sort of said this is the way you'd like it to go, it's gone better. Quite honestly, it's been amazing. The guys are just on. It's one of those indefinable things. Maybe it's because this hasn't been much of a show year. All the energy is there with the audience. Now and again we just sort of step right into a perfect frame." Richards says each time a Stones tour ends it could be the last, but invariably there is contact between members, and the whole process starts again. "There is usually some sort of phoning after six to nine months. 'Well, you know, whaddya think ... I'm ready.' It kind of starts from there. I guess in a way it's an itch." Some years ago, there seemed to be no itches left. Jagger and Richards were portrayed in the press as being in a state of war over the band's direction and solo projects that stretched the very ties that bound the Stones together. "That happened 10-12 years ago, 1985-86. In retrospect, it was inevitable in any long-running team, especially one so successful as the Stones," Richards said. "We just all said 'We're in prison, inside a Stones vacuum.' "It was more a fight against that in retrospect than it was between Mick and me hard-nosing. Obviously, with us being the two high-profile ones, it would come off like that. He had one way of dealing with it, and I had another way of dealing with it. The big test is, do you come back together again?"
'Sometimes Mick winds me up just to get me going, because he needs a bit of fire. I'll make him pissed off, and then I'll yell, and he'll get angry, and then we got the blood flowing.'
They did come back, cutting the "Steel Wheels" album and going on tour in 1989-90, followed by their "Voodoo Lounge" work and a new Virgin Record contract a few years later. "We came back with a lot more experience and a lot more air between us. We all learned a few things about being out there on our own, including Charlie (drummer Watts), which is probably one of the more important things," Richards said. "I think Mick found out that a great record means more than just having a few songs and being a lead singer. You don't throw a band together overnight just because they're the top hands in the world. Very rarely do the top hands in the world gel, and he learned that," he went on. "I learned what it means to be a frontman. It is all go. In this gig I can always hang with Charlie and just jam. Charlie had a lot more appreciation for what Mick and I had been doing, running the Stones between us. Positive lessons got learned." Richards may think of offering the band's conflict resolution methods to a self-help publisher since few marriages - and fewer rock bands -- stay together as long as the Stones have. "It's the hanging together that makes the band -- that delicate, fragile thing, the personality, the chemistry of everybody being actually able to tolerate each other. Because you wear yourself pretty ragged on the road. 'I hate you forever,' we'll say it one day, but forever lasts 24 hours." "Sometimes Mick winds me up just to get me going, because he needs a bit of fire. I'll make him pissed off, and then I'll yell, and he'll get angry, and then we got the blood flowing. We kind of play with it in a way, almost as much as we play the instruments, we play each other," Richards said. He said life on the road as the band gets on in years runs the same course as ever. His hotel room, wherever the locale, is tagged the "baboon cage," where everyone can practice long-established rock 'n' roll rituals peculiar to the road. "Quite honestly, on the road it's pretty much the same as ever. After a show, we get back to the hotel, and within a half-hour there's a knock on the door, people drop by for a drink, discuss the show, have a few more drinks, play more sounds, and before you know it, the sun's up," he said. "You never know what's going to happen, and that's all that's ever happened. The thing is you just hang around. Everybody thinks 'wild party,' as if there is some sort of big design going on. But, really, you just go to the room and see what happens." For now, that is what drives Richards -- the present, not the past and not the future. As long as music is coming out of the Stones, its famously still-alive-and-lucid lead guitarist will be taking to the road, again and again and again, humping his guitar onstage, simply because he likes it. "I just don't want to see the Stones gasping hungrily to be up to date and have hit records or anything. I just want the Stones to do the best they can. They're the only ones who can do it," he said. "I want to make really good stuff. If we get hits out of it, fantastic, but if not they'll be damn good records, and they'll still last, and they'll be around a long time. The immediate gratification left me a long time ago. If you don't get it, you ain't been there, but maybe you'll get it further down the road."
(This interview first appeared on Reuters.)

Keith Richards - 1995


Keith Richards Interview
by Neil Hagerty and Jennifer Herrema RAYGUN Issue number 22 January 1995

Royal Trux (guitarist Neil Hagerty and singer Jennifer Herrema) first came together in 1985 and have since recorded four albums and assorted singles full of sonic confusion and seemingly random noise. Melody Maker once claimed that Royal Trux "were drawing out the most decadent excesses of the Rolling Stones' bluesiest period in their druggy, distracted, fogged haze." They have been called "unclassifiable."
Keith Richards has lived the archetypal rock n roll myth for 30 years with seemingly supernatural powers of survival. He's taken illicit substances and chugged down enough Jack Daniels to kill off the average army platoon. Everyone seems to have a favorite Keith story, just as they have a favorite riff---the drug busts, the blood transfusions, the complete disregard for authority and celebrity. Now he's 50 and happily married with children. Keith says he now has two families and they all get on just fine, which pleases him just fine. With so many inlaws, most people would find it impossible to play the part of outlaw, but he is still as removed, as outside, as much of a loner as ever.
Seems like a good idea to introduce these people... We were down in Memphis, Tennessee, mixing our first record for Virgin, and the Stones were playing the Liberty Bowl. We'd been there about a week. On the eve of the concert, we got home from the studio around four AM, and some idiot stopped and asked to see our room keys. Jennifer noticed the armed guards around the ornate lobby of the Peabody hotel. The Stones had arrived.
In the afternoon around 4:20pm I went downstairs for breakfast tea and the bellboy asked me if I was in town for the concert. I said, "Yes, I'm doing an interview with Keith Richards." That shut him up. And yet, it was true. Someone had decided that it owuld be nice to pair up the demi-monde genii Royal Trux and Keith Richards in an interview.My first reaction was no fucking way, but Jennifer said she would do the interview, and all I had to do was pose for some pictures, so I said okay. Now here we are getting into a couple of chauffered Town Cars and heading to the Liberty Bowl for the Stones sound check.
The Stones were sprawled out on the huge Voodoo Lounge stage. Mick Jagger suggested they play "Can't Get Next To You." The band lit into it, the Al Green arrangement. It was great. I'd like to hear music this size in my front yard. The women from the concession stands came dancing into the bleachers and then, of course, the security guards chased us all away. Even my precious backstage pass was useless. We retreated to the "meet and greet" area, the nobody land inside the Stones' backstage compound.
The interview began soon after in Keith's trailer. Jennifer went in, and I waited for the photographer to fetch me. I saw Travis Tritt and Marty Stuart walking around.
{The guitarist once known as the most elegantly wasted man in rock 'n' roll burst into the trailer looking suitably svelte and ragged. He was wearing the trademarked spray-on black drainpipes, unbuttoned white shirt, skull ring, and a pair of black t-shirt sleeves rolled up his arm like skateboard pads.}
Keith Richards: I'm saving up for the whole shirt. Got the sleeves, now I'm working on the collar.
{The first thing one notices about the rock 'n' roll anti-hero is that he's extremely affable and nothing like the dark lord legend portrays. Keith claims he learned how to be well-mannered during his most strung-out, drugged-out days of neglect.}
KR: Dealing with those kind of people taught me how to be not like them, taught me how to be a gentleman.
Jennifer Herrema: Our engineer says you blew up his speakers once. You plugged in a bass, hit the shit out of it and blew the mains.
KR: I can't exactly remember that. It sounds very likely. These things keep happening to me.
JH: Have you seen the ducks in the Peabody Hotel? They march them around every afternoon at five.
KR: Darling, at five I'm either asleep or I ain't around.
{People on the tour claim that Keith still keeps the hours of a vampire. He's been described as the walking dead, or walking undead. Either way, he's rarely seen out at night, and is more rarely spotted in daylight. Last night was an exception.}
JH: Did you go down to Beale Street?
KR: Last night, I played a number at BB King's joint. It was a sing for your supper kind of deal. They asked me up on stage and I just said "Forget it, it's my day off." Then they offered to cancel the check, so of course I played. We love playing clubs. I mean, the Rolling Stones could kill a club. Trying to drag a stadium into shape is another thing. We're still trying to figure out how to communicate good music to a stadium. God joins the goddamn band every night in the form of wind, rain, and lightning. It sounds like old time show biz, but an audience that size really can turn you on. You can have a temperature of 130 degrees and feel like shit, but the moment you hit the stage, it doesn't matter because they give you the adrenaline. As you know, there have been times in the past when I've arrived on stage in not the best shape in the world and only the crowd kept me going. Gigs are all about an exhange of adrenaline. Quite often, you come off stage feeling better because you've sweat it out.
JH: So the Rolling Stones have discovered the cure for the common cold?
KR: Yes, play stadiums.
JH: Do you remember the first time you played a big stage?
KR: After palying clubs for two or three years, we finally hit our first 3,000 capacity theater. The stage we have now fo rthe Voodoo Lounge tour is supposed to be the biggest in the world, yet nothing can ever seem bigger than that first big stage. It was '63 and I remember we played with Bo Diddley, Little Richard, and the Everly Brothers. Talk about being thrown in at the deep end! The Stones in a club is still the ultimate rush. THAT IS IT. Everything else we've doen is simply adjusting to conditions. Rock 'n' roll is really a small room thing. Over the years, we've had to learn to do it bigger. It just keeps getting bigger and bigger. It's like some kind of Frankenstein's monster, some huge juggernaut. And you can end up working for it, rather than it working for you. It can get so fucking big you can't do what you want to do anymore, which means you have to deal with a whole lot of frustration. That's why the Beatles stopped. We never did, and everytime we come back to touring they have more high-tech gizmos that you've got to learn how to work. Now we're working for the huge stadium screen. The first ten, twenty rows may be looking at the stage, but everyone else is looking at the screen, which means the band are working with the cameramen...I've always been suspicious of TV, I've always found music and video to be an unhappy marriage. MTV turned it into a money-making proposition by making people look at songs, but you're supposed to listen. They're selling records by eyesight, you know? You're confusing the senses. If you had a blindfold on, you can get into music ten times more effectively than watching pre-conceived images of what the song means. Music suffered for it in the Eighties, when what looked good was more important than what sounded good...Good music comes out of people playing together, knowing what they want to do and going for it. You have to sweat over it and bug it to death. You can't do it by pushing buttons and watching a TV screen.
JH: Yeah, sometimes when Neil is playing guitar with our new bass player it sounds so good, I forget to sing.
KR: I know how that is. We just got a new bass player ourselves, Darryl. He's fantastic. Old Bill, I guess we just wore him out.
{Keith's conversation is littered with one-liner's and random musings. His laugh lines are etched so deep, he's beginning to resemble the blues legends he has spent a lifetime lionizing. He gives the impression that if you crossed him, he'd probably crack the same wide smile while nailing your hands and feet to the nearest piece of furniture. It's probably best not to mess with Keith. When a fan leapt onstage in '81, Richards felled the tresspasser with his guitar because "He was on my stage."}
JH: How many tracks did you record for this record?
KR: We recorded 40. We wrote about 150. Then we cut it down to 15 songs. We thought, "That's a lot of tracks for an album," but them we considered that it would be okay because it's been five years since the last album. Besides, if we had tried to cut any more tracks off the album there'd have been shooting--we'd have killed each other. None of us back down easily...Someone once asked me if we still fight about this stuff. Was Sharon Tate's living room a mess? Of course we still fight, but it's also an argument within yourself. I was just talking to Ronnie (Wood) about our record Exile On Main Street. There's so much on it, there's a long way to go. Now that album is held up in our face as the criteria by which all Stones albums must be judged, but when it was actually released, it got terrible reviews. It was a double album, there was so much on it and no one knew what to make of it.
JH: Yeah, I know how that is.
{A tour staffer asks Keith what he thinks of all the bands at present who seem obsessed by the Keith Richards image...}
KR: It's quite flattering really. I keep seeing myself on the TV. Everybody starts by imitating their heroes. For me it was Chuck Berry and Muddy Waters. I say good luck to people who want to emulate me, but they better realize what they're getting into; they better know that there's more to this than attitude. It's about the music; it's about the blues. That's what sustains me. It's an amazing form of music that has a strength and vulnerability which seems to me to be translated throughout someone's life. At nine or 90, it's utterly timeless. But I'd never discourage a bunch of guys and girls getting together to play music. It's the one thing that may retain their sanity. You don't have to be a fucking star. Music is something from your own heart for your own home. There's a part of me that's saying, "What, you mean people really like me?" It's a funny business, and it's just as much a mystery to me now as when we started.
{Tour staffer brings in Neil and the photographer...}
Alan Messer: It's been a long time. I did shoot with you in 1969 at Hyde Park.
KR: AH....Hyde Park...1969...a good year...a good year for some.
{Tour staffer introduces Neil...}
KR: She was just talking about you.
NH: Oh? That's cool, I guess.
{Tour staffer asks Keith about his motivation when he writes songs...}
KR: I look for ambiguity when I'm writing because life is ambiguous. I have no idea what the audience makes of me. Sometimes I don't know whether I'm going under their heads or over their heads. Writing songs is a peculiar practice anyway. I never feel I write them, I'm just an antenna and the songs ae already zooming through the room, and I hope to pick up something. I sit with a guitar or at the piano and play my favorite Buddy Holly or Otis Redding songs and, with a bit of luck, something suddenly happens and you're off on your own track. Maybe it's because I never deliberately sit down to write songs that it still happens. I've written more lately than ever before. I recieve and transmit-it's that simple. If I actually believe I created something, I'd be in big fucking trouble. There's no godhead ego, I don't believe in the grand bold type "WRITTEN BY KEITH RICHARDS." I just pick up the songs and pass them on. They aren't mine, they're everybody's. To me, the best songs are the ones that come to you in dreams. I wake up, put it down on a cassette next to the bed, turn over and go back to sleep. I wrote "Satisfaction" that way.
NH: Yeah, but when I dream a song now, I dream the video.
KR: That's MTV for you, fucking with the senses. I never lose faith in the power of music to get through, though. When the scenes go dead, there will still be the music...and I'll still be there playing it.
{Tour staffer asks Keith if he ever met the devil at the crossroads again, what kind of deal would he ask for this time...}
KR: A better one! The devil doesn't bother me, it's God that pisses me off. Him and his rain. You wait until I meet the motherfucker. Doesn't he know who we are? We're the Rolling Stones!
{At this point another tour staffer comes into the trailer...}
TS: They need this trailer. Keith has to go to wardrobe.
NH/JH: Have a good show. (blah, blah, blah)
KR: Right, keep the faith, rock on. (blah, blah, blah)
We go out front to watch the Rolling Stones make their entrance. Our comp seats were great. The girl in front of us wanted to bet that "Not Fade Away" would be their opening number. She was right. It was a good version. We stayed until this woman behind us asked me to sit down. I shot her a "what's your fucking problem" look and left. I didn't smell much pot smoke. We went back and watched the rest of the show from a special roped-off section at the side of the stage. A woman in high-heels slipped on the seats in front of us and rolled three rows. She got up when Mick Jagger came our way on the luminous catwalk that flanked the stage. She got up dancing. The song was "Monkey Man." Keith did a brilliant, strong guitar solo on "Satisfaction," of all songs. Ronnie Wood had a slide solo on "Shattered." Mick Jagger danced with a gigantic projection of a cartoon she-devil during "Beast of Burden." It was a much better concert than the '81/'82 show we saw in DC.At the end of the encore, there was a big pyrotechnic display. This, as we later learned, functions as a diversion while the Rolling Stones make their escape from the stadium in unmarked vans. Anyway, we watched the fireworks and called our driver.
All in all, Keith was a perfect gentleman. He lit Jennifer's cigarettes for her throughout the interview.

Keith Richards - 1986


Keith On Keeping On
interview with Keith Richards


There was a time when the Rolling Stones gleefully played up to a shameless need among certain of their disciples for some kind of hedonistic role model. All very fab 'n' groovy at first, I suppose. Except I have this feeling that the Stones themselves, after a time, must have got heartily sick of it! just think for a minute ... These guys have been consistently deliverting the right stuff, both on vinyl and in person, for twenty-five years. "The Greatest Rock'n'Roll Band in the World" is at once both your mandatory show-biz hokum and a prosaic statement of fact.So I guess it is some kind of tribute to the enduring seductiveness and potency of whatever bizarre tableau they evoke that no one ever stops to ponder how they can possibly still be out there - as prolific, creative and compelling as ever - if they're all supposed to be your lovable ol' burn-outs! Well, that's show business, folks! And I'm sure they must still get a kick out of it.Now, at this point I'm hoping some of the more perceptive among you will have divined what all this is about. It can mean only one thing. Yes, you got it ... there's a new Stones album out. Called Dirty Work (the first single off it being "Harlem Shuffle"). And since the first hint of a new Stones product usually generates an unseemly stampede throughout all they survey, I must say I find it greatly reassuring that the guys still care enough to come out and do the rounds of interviews. They're checking in with us, making contact. Hey, these guys like us!So on the appointed day, at the highly civilized hour of three-thirty in the afyernoon, I presented myself at the Stones' New York office, just a Stones' throw from Columbus Circle. While most of Manhattan was agonizing over whether (a) to observe Lincoln's Birthday (b) Valentine's Day counted as a public holiday and (c) we could take the whole damn week off because of the snow, there was none of that kind of nonsense at the Stones' office. Very much business as usual.Keith had phoned ahead with apologies: He'd been delayed leaving the house and would be a few minutes late. A small courtesy, but kind of pleasing in a way. And since the "delay" turned out to be only two or three minutes, it might even score more points than arriving on the dot!I was shown into a room dominated by a large conference table, the usual vulgar display of framed "platinum" discs refreshingly absent. No need for such ostentation here. Wonder where they keep 'em all? Probably in storage until the recording industry designs awards eye-pleasing enough to be worth wall space.Off in another room a redundant telephone warbled soothingly. One left secure in the knowledge that someone, somewhere, would attend to it.The door opens. Enter, Keith.Nattily turned out in a dark blue pinstripe suit, the effect artfully softened by a loosely fitting creamy silk blouse.Coffee is brought in, and an ashtray for Keith. The scene is set.So here it is, then. My tete-a-tete with Keith Richards. And a pleasurable experience it was, too. For me, anyway. Ask the guy a straight question and you get a straight answer. But then, you'd expect that, wouldn't you? I mean, you can't get much more direct, incisive and unpretentious than a Keith Richards riff. It's almost as if the guitar had evolved to the stage where it needed a Keith Richards to come along and reach in and give us a glimpse of part of its true essence, its proto-soul. Keith's unique view of his relationship to his instrument is revealed when he talks )below) of how he first came to "... touch the guitar." Oh, sure, we've had more flamboyant players who, in varying degrees, have worked the same magic - Jimi Hendrix and Jeff Beck come immediately to mind. But with Keith it's not just a guy playing the guitar; the guitar sometimes appears to be playing him - drawing, as he does, on a solid and still-vital blues tradition, sifting and nurturing that rich harvest with just right sensibilities, thereby becoming the medium - our medium - for its expression, and contributing in the process to some of the more significant songs in our rock repertoire!The Rolling Stones have carved themselves a sizable niche as the spearhead of a movement that awakened the American consciousness to that neglected part of its own musical hertitage - the blues. In this respect their influence has probably been more far-reaching than that of that flank of the British "invasion," the Beatles. Plus, the Stones are still very much with us!When Keith spoke of Muddy Waters at the close of our interview, I like to think he was unconsciously expressing hopes for his and the Stones' future.

Keith Richards - Guitar World 1999

Sitting in the New York office of his manager, Keith Richards recounts a meeting he had with Babyface, the slick r&b; producer Mick Jagger hired to do one track on the new Rolling Stones album, Bridges to Babylon: "I said, `So you're Babyface?' " The guitarist pauses for emphasis, drawing on a Marlboro. " `You gonna cut with Mick, your face is gonna look like mine. You may be Babyface now, but you're gonna be Fuckface like me after you get out of the studio with that guy!' "
The deep lines on Richards' wizened face may not all have been put there by his legendary squabbles with his lead singer, songwriting partner and Glimmer Twin of some 37 years' standing. But it's safe to say they were etched there by a life lived 100 percent for rock and roll. Keef's profound devotion to rock has carried him safely through four decades of mayhem and madness with the World's Greatest Rock and Roll Band, through jailings, grievous bodily harm, poxed groupies, marriages and relationships with sundry dangerous blondes, a decade-long entanglement with Dame Heroin and Lord knows what other substances.
His vital connection with rock and roll cuts deeper than all those things, way down into the music's blues roots out through the branches of rock's African Diaspora cousins: reggae, funk and soul. Who else but Keith Richards could cut a rip-snortin' rockabilly track for the recent Scotty Moore tribute disc All the Kings Men, then turn around and do an album of earthy Nyabinghi drumming and chanting with the Wingless Angels, a circle of his Rastafarian "bredren" at his house in Jamaica?
Richards carries all this music not just in his heart or his head, but in his whole body. It's there in the snaky way he walks across a room, even at age 53. And it's certainly there in the way he attacks a guitar, arms flailing, his spinal column whipping to the beat. Keef has always been a very physical guitarist, right from the Stones' early days as a lawless, unwashed alternative to the Beatles. Pete Townshend even copped his signature "windmill" strum from Keith Richards. The chunky drive of Richards' guitar work propelled the Stones through their first incarnation as a British Invasion singles band par excellence, with hits like "Satisfaction," "The Last Time," "Get Off of My Cloud," "19th Nervous Breakdown," "Paint It Black," "Mother's Little Helper," "Have You Seen Your Mother, Baby, Standing in the Shadow?" and "Ruby Tuesday." With sinewy rhythms and landmark solos, his guitar took the Rolling Stones into their late Sixties/early Seventies apotheosis as one of the all-time greatest album-rock bands via their mighty tetralogy: Beggar's Banquet, Let It Bleed, Sticky Fingers and Exile on Main Street.
Richards stuck with his guitar while his original Stones co-guitarist Brian Jones grew absorbed with sitars, dulcimers, recorders and Moroccan drums and fell by the wayside, dead at age 27. With Mick Taylor at his side, Keef expanded the Stones' guitar palette. His discovery of five-string open G tuning brought forth monumental hooks like those in "Honky Tonk Women," "Brown Sugar" and "Start Me Up." The Keith Richards guitar style remained a rock-solid constant as Taylor was replaced by Ronnie Wood, and as the Stones slogged through their "disco" period ("Miss You"). The craggy-faced guitarist even kept the faith during a protracted and bitter feud with Mick Jagger over the latter's solo career. It looked like the end of the Rolling Stones. But the group reunited with 1989's solid Steel Wheels.
Though they may bicker like an old married couple on an RV vacation, the bottom line is Jagger and Richards need each other. Richards' solo work without Jagger has tended to sound like Rolling Stones rhythm tracks before the vocal melodies get put on. And Jagger's solo outings have generally offered great melodies and wry lyrics on a disposable bed of flavor-of-the-month jello. It's only when the legendary duo works together that the sparks really fly, musically and otherwise.
"Mick brings the pop element," says Richards. "He's more interested in what's happening now. I'm more interested in keeping the Stones what they are and not following trends."
The Mick `n Keef polarity was fully charged when the Rolling Stones set up camp at Oceanway Studios in L.A. to record Bridges to Babylon, which finds the Stones dabbling in everything from hip hop samples to Indonesian gamelan sounds. Even at their age, rock's perennial adventurers still have a few aces up their sleeves.
GUITAR WORLD: The new Stones album takes in a broad range of styles.
KEITH RICHARDS: I feel like it's the first one where we've really been able to push the boundaries since we've come back together after the five years of World War Three between Mick and me. Steel Wheels was us getting back together and seeing if we could incorporate the things we'd learned from playing with other people into the Rolling Stones II, as it were. With Voodoo Lounge we were definitely getting back on the track a little more. But this is the first one where I think we were really able to push the limits, stylistically. Maybe it was the world touring. You listen to a lot of shit over two and half years' time, going from South Africa to Japan: different local music all the time. Because you always want to check out what the local cats are doing. And what goes in must come out, in one way or another. You have to be careful what you listen to, if you want to write songs.
GW:Are there songs on there where you and Mick just sat down together in a room with a guitar and wrote, like in the old days?
RICHARDS: Oh yeah. That's the way it always starts. We began writing this album `round November, down in the Village [Greenwich Village in New York City], in a little demo studio called Dangerous Music. I wanted to cut the whole album there, it was sounding so good, but it was a bit too small for everybody. We got five or six tracks together in a week there, and did a little bit in London in December. And then we started working in L.A., in February. The songs came pretty easy. They usually do. Our problem is what to leave off. It's the Solomon thing: cut the baby in half. "Well you can't have that off." "I refuse to leave that off. No way." But I suppose that's a better problem than not having enough.
GW: What is it that makes you such a prolific songwriter?
RICHARDS: Personally, I don't consider that you create or write anything. The best way to think about it, for me anyway, is that you're an antenna. I sit down at an instrument-guitar, piano, bass or whatever-and play somebody else's songs. And usually within 20 minutes, more or less, suddenly something's coming. And that's when the antenna goes up. [He wets his finger and raises it in the air.] Incoming! So you get this sort of gift. You work it up a bit and then transmit it. The idea that "I wrote that," or "I created that" is an overblown artistic sort of thing that people love to put on writing songs. It can screw you up. If you think that it's all down to you, you've got another thing coming.
GW: You've played with nearly all the guitar greats: Eric Clapton, B.B. King, Chuck Berry, John Lee Hooker, Buddy Guy . . .
RICHARDS: Lucky old me. I know, it's amazing.
GW: Is there a key, for you, to meshing with another guitarist? What's your secret?
RICHARDS: First of all, you really have to want it. I knew all those guys' stuff so well. Their styles. So it was, "Just give me a crack at it, man." For me, to be second guitar to Chuck Berry on Hail! Hail! Rock `n' Roll, I looked up and realized, "Shit man, when you started, you'd have died and gone to heaven. This was all you ever wanted." But what I found out is that all of the great players are basically such gentlemen. B.B. and Muddy Waters, both straight up guys. They've got nothing to fear. They always encourage. They're always concerned about other people. They're never self centered. When I look back and think, "Shit, I played with those guys," that's enough. I don't want no money. I mean, thanks for the money, but to have Muddy Waters say to you, "Hey, show me that lick you did..." Everybody's a perennial teenager when it comes to shit like that.
GW: Were any of those guys a little more frightening than others?
RICHARDS: Well, Chuck's difficult. He's just a loner and he doesn't have many friends. That's why he has a little chip on his shoulder. But if you get him going, he's another gent. An absolute prize. Energy and knowledge. Just a lot of mood swings. That's the only difference between him and the other cats. And he's hard to handle at times. Which is why he's never kept a band together since he got rid of the original one: Johnny Johnson and Ebby Harding and Willie [Dixon]. And he never made a record that sounds as good, either. A little cheap too, that way. That's why he plays with the worst band in town whenever he turns up. But at the same time he's a sweet guy. He's just more fragile.
GW: The video of you guys playing with Muddy Waters is pretty amazing. Mick was really good.
RICHARDS: The man can get up there next to Muddy Waters and hold his own. That's a hell of a task. But sometimes Mick, like anybody with a talent, he takes it for granted. He'll say like, "Oh no, not another blues, man." But Mick, that's what you're great at. I suppose he feels that he's done it so many times. But I don't think you could ever do the blues too many times, quite honestly. It's one of the most fascinating forms of music I know, and I listen to a lot of styles. It's such a honed-down form. It travels well. It can pick up on what's happening and be a viable vehicle for songwriting. It's probably the most important thing that America has ever given to the world. From Leadbelly to B.B. King to Buddy Guy and all the stops in between, it's just such an amazingly flexible form.
GW: I think the basic simplicity of it is what allows that variety.
RICHARDS: Exactly. That very strict form can be very restricting for people that can't play it properly. But very little blues is actually 12 bars. It's more like 13 1/2 or 11 1/2. Jimmy Reed was famous for adding on an extra half bar here and there. Just letting it hang. But it's a musical form that just seems to be inexhaustible in its potential.
GW: Why do these African-derived forms-blues, reggae-speak so deeply to us white Europeans?
RICHARDS: It's bones. `Cause probably we all come from Africa. We just went north and turned white. But if you cut anybody open, bones is white and blood is red, man. It's kind of deep, you know. And I think maybe it speaks to us in that way. Ancient bone marrow responding to the source. That's the only one I can come up with. Why else should we recognize it? All it points out is the superficiality of racial differences. [Flashing his skull ring] That's why I wear this; beauty's skin deep.
GW: Would you say that you're a spiritual person?
RICHARDS: Yeah, but not religious. Spirit is all around me. Very much. That's why I did the Wingless Angels album: very spiritual music. But mine is a very nebulous spirituality. I wouldn't care to put a name on it. [laughs] I don't want to place any bets. [assumes American game-show host accent]: "Oh, you picked the wrong god. Sorry, it's Allah." Religion is like Las Vegas. Placing bets on something. I prefer to take the larger point of view. Hey, give thanks and praises, whoever you are, wherever you are, whatever you are. I never got a post card from anybody that left. Maybe they don't sell stamps up there.
GW: The Dust Brothers told me you and Ronnie had pretty much every cool guitar and amp in the world at Oceanway Studios.
RICHARDS: It did look kind of like an elitist showroom: lines and lines of old Fender amps. We pick them up wherever we can. You probably don't use half of them in the studio. But if you leave one behind, that's the one you're gonna want. And there was an elegant array of guitars there, from Thirties Gibsons and Martins to brand new ones people would bring by. I'd try so many guitars and amps by now, I have no idea which takes were used and which guitars I was using on which take.
GW: In the earliest days of the Stones, you were using mainly Les Pauls and semi-acoustic Epiphones. What attracted you to those guitars?
RICHARDS: Well, the Les Paul was just the best guitar available at that time. It was my first touch with a really great, classic rock and roll electric guitar. And so I fell in love with them for a while. It wasn't until I got to the States that I finally started getting my hands on some good old Telecasters. I'd always liked Telecasters. That Fender sound-dry. James Burton-king! But they were hard to find in England in those days. There were newer ones. New then, that is. We're talking `62! I slowly got into Telecasters the more I worked in the States. And Strats too. Even now, in the studio, I'd still say it's about 50/50.
But there's a lot of guys making good guitars today. Music Man made me a beautiful six-string bass, which I used that a lot on the Wingless Angels stuff. They've also built me some five and six-string guitars which are really compact, great instruments, especially for the stage. They're a nice size. Hey, makes you look bigger.

Keith Richards - Playboy Germany 1998 (extrait)


THE TOKYO TAPES
From the lastest edition of Playboy Germany.
© 1998 Playboy Enterprises, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
excerpt……..

Introduction
It is utter turmoil at the reception of the Four Seasons Hotel in Tokyo. Front desk manager Danilo Zucchetti, one of the most likable people I have ever met, is surrounded by three American couples vociferously complaining about last night's disturbance. Danilo looks positively desperate. What happened? It is quite simple: The Rolling Stones have booked into the hotel and their crazy guitarist has lived up to his image being the world's longest-serving rock'n'roller. After a two-hour Playboy interview, Keith had spent a gig-free early night playing guitar and listening to music until the early hours of the morning. And as is normal for him, it was played at an extreme volume!
During our interview, Keith discovers himself to be a brilliantly intelligent partner trying to pull all the stops of eloquence: moody and funny remarks, amusing bon mots, furious British humor; but we also hear thoughtful remarks from a man who has seen all the highs and lows of the rock'n'roll business. Richards, 54, is a truly elemental force: With his face furrowed like a ploughed field, with gray wiry hair, his fingers slightly gouty, without an ounce of fat on his lean body, chain smoking and drinking vodka, he sits opposite me. He wears a T-shirt with his waistcoat, some indeterminate pair of jeans and worn leather galoshes. A long scarf is dangling from his belt and he is wearing the inevitable skull ring on his right ring finger.
Two hours and one bottle of Moskovskaya (red label) later, I know more. More about the Stones, their current "Bridges To Babylon" tour, a hydraulic bridge, a Rasta band named Wingless Angels, Elton "Sir Brown Nose" John and the said skull ring.
………………………..
PLAYBOY: A different subject: Keith Richards, the producer. You have just produced a record with the Wingless Angels. How did this come into existence?
RICHARDS: It was pure coincidence, totally unplanned. After the "Voodoo Lounge" tour, I wanted to go on holiday, to my house in Jamaica. I deserved that. Hanging around with the brothers for a while, smoking a bit, playing a bit, all those things you do on a little paradise island. I've known the guys since 1971 or 1972. They're from a Rastafarian town. We met on the beach. They didn't know anything about the Stones and all the fuss. It was great, because I was able to keep my anonymity. They watched and heard me play the guitar and invited me over. This music, someone from Africa once said, is more African than African music itself. It's been surviving there in the jungle hills for hundreds of years without influences from the outside. Voices, drums, that's it. Without planning anything, we started playing for fun. They brought the drums into my house and I was utterly fascinated with the beauty of this music. One night, we went in my Range Rover to the studio in Kingston, 15 Rastas with their drums. And I knew instantly - that won't work. You can't put them in a sterile studio. It's too regulated. Well, we thought, then we'll keep it to ourselves. Not for the public!
PLAYBOY: And how did the story go on?
RICHARDS: Very mysteriously. As I said, in 1995, after the "Voodoo Lounge" tour, I was in Jamaica. I met the guys again and a representative of the Jamaican Film Board heard one of our sessions. That's got to be recorded, he said, and I told him about the unsuccessful attempt a few years ago. A few days later, a mobile recording studio showed up in front of my house - a "present" from the man from the Film Board. Well, fine, but who was supposed to operate the equipment? The next day, there's a knock on my door, and the only person in the world who could record something like this, stood there in front of me - Rob Faboni, who had got married in Jamaica, and who knew the guys. It was really strange. It dawned on me that my holiday would be entirely canceled, and that some secret forces somewhere had become active. My house was turned into a studio: drums, microphones, cables etc. After a month, about halfway through the project, Chris Blackwell (the founder of Island Records and who initiated the worldwide success of reggae music) appeared and said: "Once you've finished recording, I would be delighted to release the record!" This was when I knew: "Hey, we're really doing some work here."
PLAYBOY: You did play the guitar for this production, didn't you?
RICHARDS: Yes, I found that to be a very special honor. Normally, all instruments, apart from the drums, are an absolute no-no for these serious Rasta songs. But the boys insisted on me taking part in it. We then went to New York with the basic recordings and I wondered what other instrumental elements could be added at all. I could think of only one person who would fit in: Frankie Gavin, an Irishman, who masters about any instrument you can possibly think of: violin, concertina, flutes and many others. He is the sort of person who can play with Peruvian musicians just as well as with Irish folk groups or Hungarian Gypsies. All of a sudden, there was a knock on my door and Frankie Gavin stood outside, asking me, "I happened to be in town and I wonder whether you've got some work for me?" Everything just fell into place. Jah had a hand in it. I knew then who I was working for (laughs).

Keith Richards - AOL live 1998

AOLiveMC2: Good evening KEITH RICHARDS, and welcome to AOL Live! We are delighted you could join us this evening. Our audience is ready with some questions for you.
KEITHL1VE: Hello everybody
OnlineHost: Hello Keith and Welcome to AOL Live!
KEITHL1VE: Hello
OnlineHost: Here is our first question...
Question: Hi Keith! I am a huge fan of the Rolling Stones. How did you and Mick first get started with the band, and how long did it take for the band to really get going?
KEITHL1VE: Mick and I knew each other since we were kids. We re-met again when we were about 15 and both found ourselves interested in the same music and by the time we were 17 we had met Charlie and Brian Jones and the band formed itself. In other words, we didn't form the Rolling Stones, The Rolling Stones formed us. The rest is history.
Question: What are the chances you'll play more small halls? I missed you in Port Chester but caught MTV. Seems to me your voice is better than ever.
KEITHL1VE: Thanks. About the small gigs...as many as we can do. It's difficult to say how many, or where they will be because they seem to crop up when it's convenient or possible. So it's hard to say.
Question: Keith, what prompted the drastic change in style from your early rock heavy days to this more mellow, even tempo style of rock? I really love your new sound!! Keep it up man!
KEITHL1VE: Another thanks. It's called growing up, and I keep growing.
OnlineHost: Okay....next question
Question: Keith, tell us a little more about the song "Low Down"? I just love that tune and was hoping you would play it in Madison last October.
KEITHL1VE: "Low Down" is the first song that Mick and I wrote specifically for Bridges to Babylon. I like it too. We've just started playing it live.
Question: Keith, who taught you how to D-tune your ax.
KEITHL1VE: I learnt this from old blues players and from listening to records. But the first guy I actually saw playing the tuning was Ry Cooder and that was in the late '60s. It fascinated me then, and fascinates me even more now.
Question: Mr. Richards, first of all I just want to say that I love you, and thanks for the music. There's a rumor going around that as soon as the Stones' tour is over, you'll take a 6-month break and the Winos will record a new album and then tour. Is this true?
KEITHL1VE: Thanks for the schedule. I don't make plans, but I have no doubt that if the Winos have plans for me, I'll probably fall in line.
Question: Keith, rumor has it you once stayed up for nine days. Is this really true?
KEITHL1VE: It is really true. Don't try it.
OnlineHost: Okay...next one
Question: Keith what do you do to stay fit?
KEITHL1VE: I work with The Rolling Stones.
Question: Is there anything you would change about your life if you could?
KEITHL1VE: Not a thing. Just keep it interesting.
Question: Why did you call your reggae band the Wingless Angels? Can you please tell us about the project?
KEITHL1VE: The Wingless Angels are named because they all wish to go to heaven, but they have no wings. What else is new. They are a spiritual band and they make healing music and I am very proud to have been able to make the record for them and I'm following its progress with interest.
Question: We love you Keith, Are you planning a live album from this tour? If so, are there any shows that stand out as being the best so far?
KEITHL1VE: Very difficult. This tour has been unusual in its consistency at least from the band's point of view. We have recorded some of the shows and we'll probably record more as the tour develops. Whether it will be released or not is beyond my knowledge.
Question: What is a typical day for you when you are on tour? What time do you get to sleep, wake up, etc.?
KEITHL1VE: Nothing is set in concrete. As long as I'm awake by the time I have to play "Satisfaction," everything's easy.
Question: Do you still listen and Jam to the old tunes that you started with - Muddy Waters, Howlin' Wolf, etc.???
KEITHL1VE: Just about every day or so, especially if Ronnie's in the room or some of the other guys from the band. That's staple diet.
Question: Keith what is the weirdest thing you have used as a guitar pick?
KEITHL1VE: I've used a piece of a meteor which didn't last long, otherwise I try to use my fingers as much as possible.
Question: How do the Stones decide when a song is "done." Is it ultimately up to you and Mick, or is it generally a more democratic process in which Woody and Charlie have an equal say? By the way, you are still THE man!
KEITHL1VE: Thanks. A song tells you when it's done -- or a record. You realize you've done as much as you can for it and it's finished.
Question: Keith, who was the very first musical artist to make you think "Oh boy, that's what I want to do for the rest of my life!"?
KEITHL1VE: I suppose I have to say Chuck Berry. Though there are many others -- Elvis Presley, Buddy Holly, Little Richard, Eddie Cochran, the list goes on.
Question: Songs like "Flip the Switch" make reference to hell and you knowing it well. Have you been there? If so what does it look like?
KEITHL1VE: I've been there. Can't remember.
Question: What do you think of the "Paint It Blue" album - blues artists covering Stones songs?
KEITHL1VE: I thought it was very interesting. Especially some of the choice of material. And the artists that were on it. It's kind of flattering.
Question: Keith : I'm a lifelong lover of your music. You recorded a song with Tom Waits called "That Feel," which I think is great, because I think you are all about "feel." Any comments about Tom Waits ?
KEITHL1VE: First, I'd like to say hello to Tom! I enjoyed writing with Tom very much even though we only see each other every 3 or 4 years. I was always hoping we could get back together again, but he is a very elusive character.
Question: How would you, or would you want to compare the new album, with the work you've done in the past.
KEITHL1VE: If I have to compare, I must say that I am particularly happy with Babylon. From the range of material to the feeling that "Steel Wheels" represented a new beginning for the Rolling Stones, "Voodoo Lounge" consolidated it, and Babylon hints of a promise within the band that they are back ready to surprise themselves and hopefully everybody else-- pleasantly.
Question: Do you plan to do any solo work in the near future?
KEITHL1VE: Planning is not my forte, but if I get the signal from above, I don't see why not.
Question: How old were you when you got your first guitar?
KEITHL1VE: 12, 13 maybe...hard to tell. But my grandfather had one he wouldn't let me touch, just to tease me, for about six years before that.
Question: "Sympathy For The Devil" is one of the most interesting and prolific songs of our time and the movie shed light on its making was there anyone critical of the song when it was released?
KEITHL1VE: I'm sure there was but we can't find them.
Question: Is there any guitarist that you haven't played with, but would like to?
KEITHL1VE: Yes there are millions! Naming names would go on and on but the beauty of records is that you can play with these guys whether they know it or not.
OnlineHost: Next question....
Question: "Bridges to Babylon"....awesome!!! You use the same guitars everyone else does but you have a unique, unmistakeable sound, is it all in the player?
KEITHL1VE: I'd like to say yes but I have a great guy working with me who makes my guitars sound better than ever before and his name is Pierre De Beauport. He's french you know..
Question: Your personal contribution to Bridges came in the form of slow burning ballads, which was also true of "Voodoo Lounge." Is that something that happened by coincidence or is it a musical direction you are heading in at the moment?
KEITHL1VE: I have to presume it is. At the same time it's not a concious thing. I'm exploring melody I guess.
Question: After 35 years of recording and touring what keeps it interesting for you now? P.S. I still think you are the sexiest man in all of rock'n'roll!!
KEITHL1VE: Thanks. Any musician who wakes up every day loves to play his music. There's no effort to have to keep it fresh... it always is anyway.
Question: Keith, what Stones album do you come back and listen to the most often?
KEITHL1VE: The latest one. I have to learn the songs again!
Question: HEY KEITH, WHEN YOU WROTE "YOU DON'T HAVE TO MEAN IT", WERE YOU THINKING OF ALL YOUR TIME SPENT IN JAMAICA???
KEITHL1VE: I never thought of that...but you must be right!
Question: What kind of effect pedals do you prefer ? I've seen you use quite a few amps over the years, any one you stick with?
KEITHL1VE: Fender Twin amps, nothing else. No pedals. I leave that to Ronnie.
Question: What's the best moment during a gig?
KEITHL1VE: It's the beginning ... until the end.
Question: Keith...you recorded the record in L.A. .....not a tropical island....were there many distractions in a big city?
KEITHL1VE: Contrary to that, it was a pleasure to be able to record in a recording center again since a lot of our albums in the past decayed . A lot of our albums of the past have been recorded. But the interaction of recording in a music city helped us to pull this record together. It's difficult to record in a vacuum.
Question: Hi Keith!!!! Thanks for all the years of great music. In your opinion, what makes Charlie Watts great?
KEITHL1VE: Charlie Watts makes Charlie Watts great. He's one of the few drummers that knows the importance of swing in playing rock 'n' roll.
Question: What's the most important lesson you've learnt in your 36 years with the Rolling Stones?
KEITHL1VE: How to swing.
Question: Keith, I read recently that you're into Portugese rock. What the hell is it? How would you describe it? Is it worth looking into ?? Keep touring, man....you're the best!
KEITHL1VE: I'm into Portuguese music. I'm not aware that they rock. But the Portuguese do have some interesting chords for a guitar player to learn.
Question: Where did you get that awesome handcuff braclett?
KEITHL1VE: The cops gave it to me.
Question: What is playing on your boombox today?
KEITHL1VE: Heavy reggae .. Classico!
Question: Would the band ever think about getting together with another blues artist like maybe Johnny Vaughan or Buddy Guy and record a blues session just for fun?
KEITHL1VE: I'd do anything for fun. With Buddy Guy or anybody else. It's always a pleasure to play the blues.
Question: What was the most challenging aspect of of cutting this record compared to "Voodoo Lounge"?
KEITHL1VE: The Dust Brothers.
Question: What kind of guitar do you use when you are composing?
KEITHL1VE: The first one that comes to hand.
Question: In all of your years as a successful musician, what would you say has been your best experience?
KEITHL1VE: I'm still waiting for it.
Question: On the "Bridges" album, "Flip the Switch" ends kind of abruptly, almost like in a "live" situation. Was this done purposely or by accident?
KEITHL1VE: We never make accidents.
Question: Who thought up the album cover for "Sticky Fingers"?
KEITHL1VE: Andy Warhol.
Question: Will you write your autobiography. I think you are one of the most fascinating members of the band.
KEITHL1VE: The truth can kill -- but maybe.
Question: Keith, how often do you play your Tele's without the high E string? Why do you prefer this method? Thanks! Andy in Maryland
KEITHL1VE: Ok Andy...It's the low E string thats off and the guitar is tuned to an open G chord. And it suits me.
Question: What do you think of the Rock 'n' Roll Hall of Fame?
KEITHL1VE: I'm in.
Question: What is the best thing you have liked about being a rock star and the worst thing?
KEITHL1VE: I love it all, maybe too much because I can't remember the worst thing.
Question: Southern Greetings from Atlanta Keith from Kelly. I saw you at the Georgia Dome in December! Tell me how you and the band prepare for such an energetic show?
KEITHL1VE: We get out of bed.
Question: Keith.. what did you think of using the internet to choose a song on the "Bridges to Babylon tour?" I saw you in Charlotte and Philadelphia..
KEITHL1VE: I'm enjoying playing around with you guys. Computers are new to me and you can show me a thing or two.
Question: So Keith -- do you have any advice for Bill Clinton?
KEITHL1VE: I don't think he needs any.
Question: Hi Keith. Are you involved in any other creative outlets other than music, such as painting, like Ronny Wood?
KEITHL1VE: I did do the artwork for The Wingless Angels, but I don't like to brag.
Question: Keith, What do you consider the most underated Stones album?
KEITHL1VE: The next one.
LiveOnstge: Compared to your first U.S. Tour back in '64.... Question: Keith how different is it touring now as compared to then?
KEITHL1VE: Then it was a Volkswagen bus, now it's a plane.
Question: How long were you playing before you were able to write your own songs?
KEITHL1VE: I considered writing songs to be a totally different job to being a guitar player and then suddenly I saw the light.
Question: What's it like back stage. Or when someone meets you on the street
KEITHL1VE: Backstage is loads of "fun." If I meet you on the street, you can tell me.
Question: With your interest in Rastafarian music are you also interested in the religious part of it?
KEITHL1VE: One doesn't come without the other although...I'd rather say spiritual than religious.
Question: Keith, do you still have the Voodoo cat?
KEITHL1VE: The man is alive and well and killing squirrels and chipmunks in Connecticut.
Question: Do you think your playing style has influenced other rock guitarists?
KEITHL1VE: I know it has but whether they got the message straight is another thing.
Question: After the movie "Hail Hail Rock 'n Roll" with Chuck Berry are you two still friends and do you ever see him?
KEITHL1VE: I haven't seen Chuck since the premiere, but we're still phone friends. Call me Chuck!
Question: How is the relationship with the other members different than say 15 years ago?
KEITHL1VE: If you ask 30 years ago, there would be a difference. 15 is nothing.
Question: What is the significance of your skull ring?
KEITHL1VE: Beauty is only skin deep.
Question: A two-part Question: Keith, to what do you credit your abiliy to survive all you've been through over the years; and what's your reaction when you hear jokes like "the only things left after nuclear war will be cockroaches and Keith Richards"?
KEITHL1VE: To the first part...an incredible constitution--Don't try it! To the second, I feel sorry for the cockroaches.
Question: I was wondering if there was a particular song that meant a lot to you in way of words you wrote to it?
KEITHL1VE: In their own way, all songs mean a lot to you it's remembering what they are all about. And then you realize that it's just love.
Question: If you could choose any band to open for you on tour, who would it be and why?
KEITHL1VE: Choosing is difficult. Johnny Lang is working with us right now and he's damned good. Why change a good thing.
Question: What do you think keeps you guys together when so many groups have split apart?
KEITHL1VE: We're friends.
Question: What kind of job do you think you would have now if it hadn't been for the Rolling Stones?
KEITHL1VE: Hard labor.
Question: Keith, do you still get that big rush when the lights go down and you walk on stage playing "Satisfaction?"
KEITHL1VE: Yeah. Not only that, I always feel as if it's time to let the tigers out of the cage.
Question: What's the first thing you do every morning?
KEITHL1VE: Wake up.
Question: What's your secret to staying alive?
KEITHL1VE: Breathing.
Question: Is there anything in your life you would change if you could?
KEITHL1VE: Life changes you, you can't change life.
Question: How comfortable do you feel getting close to the fans as you walk on the ramp back to the main stage?
KEITHL1VE: Incredibly comfortable.
AOLiveMC2: We have time for one final question from the audience.
Question: Do you believe in Fate??
KEITHL1VE: The hand of it.
AOLiveMC2: KEITH, thank you for joining us and answering our audience questions. It was a pleasure having you with us tonight!
KEITHL1VE: It was incredible to watch the whole process going down I enjoyed talking to you guys. May God's light shine on you all...Keep the faith!
AOLiveMC2: Good night everyone!
AOLiveMC4: Good Night all !
OnlineHost: Copyright 1998 Virgin Records America, Inc.; licensed to America Online, Inc.

Keith Richards - Loaded magazine Nov. 95

let's talk about sex
[probablement Uncut, dont le journaliste fait partie]
Jon Wilde interviewer.

K: I was always thinking about chicks, but they were never the
motivating reason for playing rock and roll. Funnily enough it was
there for the guys to get off on. Then it just changed overnight. A
hit single and suddenly it was all 13 year old girls. Fucking
amazing! The week before, I couldn't get laid to save my life. Then
it turned 180 degrees and I'm having to fend them off. I wake up and
find that I'm a sex symbol, man.
But we didn't set out with that. It was more like a happy accident.
A nice little bonus, at least for a while. Then you realize that it's
getting insane and you have to learn to deal with it.
These chicks wouldn't have given me a second glance before. Now they're
throwing their knickers on stage with their telephone numbers on. All these
knickers coming at me. And I kept them all. I mean, it might seem
like every guy's fantasy, but it reaches a point where you have to
ask yourself: " are these the kind of chicks I want to hang with?"

Q: Legend has it that you were a late starter in the sex department?
K: Well, yeah. That might be true. But I actually find it very hard
to remember the actual first time. There were a couple of nice girls
at art school who showed me the way, but I'm not sure how far it
went.
I mean, I never got into a serious relationship until I was 20. Then
before I knew it I was on the road with the stones and there's chicks
all over the place wanting to get in my pants.
Well, I'm no bloody angel, know what I mean? So before I know it I'm
in bed with Ronnie Spector. That's when I found rock n' roll. That's
also when I learned about jealousy, cos I had Phil Spector chasing me
around with a shotgun. That's when I started ducking and diving. It
was a question of survival.

Q: What was your attitude to sex in the early days of the stones?
K: Well, it's always been the same really. It boils down to the fact
that I've never just been interested in a lay. If I'm going to be
with a woman, even if just for a day or two, then we've got to have a
laugh. And then, if we get around to screwing, that's wonderful.
But I've never started a relationship just for the purpose of
wham-bam-thankyou man. Chicks are too precious for that. I mean, I
love chicks. I love them too much to just roll over and stick it in.

Q: You were never interested in notches on the bed post?
K: Not at all. I could never understand the whole attitude with Bill.
You have to understand that he'd do it with anything and anybody. The
worst bags you could imagine. Anything.
I was only interested in real women. Not someone you dragged in, gave
her a quick one, kicked her out and chalked it up.
If I'm going to get into bed with someone, I gotta like 'em.
Otherwise, I'd rather go into a quiet corner and jerk off. My
attitude has always been that ladies are ladies and chicks are
chicks. They're not things to be chalked up on a score cards.

Q: How would you describe your attitude to groupies over the years?
K: Well, all I can say about the groupies of the 60s and 70s was
that there were some great girls. They weren't just interested in
Wham-Bam either. These chicks would look after you. You'd say, "I
don't feel so good today" and they'd come over and feed you. It
wasn't just fuck, fuck, fuck...well, sometimes it was. But other
times you needed to cool out and they were there for you.
But the whole groupie thing was different then. Even if you spent
the night with the most prolific girl, the most you'd get was a nasty
dose of Vietnamese Rose which could be sorted out with a couple of
barrels of antibiotics. Now it's a life and death thing. The stakes
are much higher.

Q: What kind of women always attracted you?
K: I never really had an ideal woman as such. I simply love the ones
who love me. I've never been the sort of guy who only likes blondes or
whatever. I like them all. I mean, chicks are endlessly fascinating to
me. They're always an education. I can have a load more fun with
chicks than with a bunch of guys. When men are left to there own
devices, they're always jousting, trying to put one over on each
other in a boring, macho way. But women have a different point of
view on things and they're not afraid to point out that I've been
behaving like an asshole. And I kinda like that.

Q: Would you describe yourself as a natural flirt?
K: Well, let's put it this way, when it comes to chicks, I like to
see a gleam in their eye. But it doesn't always have to be a sexual
thing. I can enjoy it just as much with Ronnie's mum or someone's
auntie. It doesn't always have to be some 6ft Playboy model. I know
plenty of them and they're lovely girls too. But it's as much fun to
sit down and have a laugh with Charlie's mum and say "Come here and
give us a kiss, darling".
See, I've discovered over the years that the feminine heart is very
warm. And guys have to learn to understand it. But a lot of guys,
they're so hung up on the idea of being male that they don't stop to
realize that you have to work at it to know what it's all about. Even
then, you don't really understand them. One of the things I like to
do, if I have the time, is listen to chicks talk. What are they
really on about? What are they saying about us? A lot of good songs
come out of that.

Q: There's the title track from the Some Girls album which concludes
that "Black girls just want to fuck all night"...
K: Well they do. At least in my experience. That's not all they want
to do. But if you can go all night, then they will to. I mean, Mick
wrote that line. and he was probably moaning because he couldn't keep
up with some chick he was seeing. So, in a way, it's a reverse joke.
But, y'know, some guys don't want to go all night. They're happy with
something a little quicker. As for myself, I'll keep going until I
run out of steam.
See, you have to understand that The Stones have always been a
horny bunch of bastards, and, once in a while, we'll write something
or do something that gets up people's noses. Like we got into trouble
over the posters for Black and Blue - with all these chicks tied up.
Well, I know a lot of chicks who like to be tied up. As long as it's
on a consensual basis, there's nothing much wrong with that. As far
as I'm concerned, a man and a woman can do anything they like
together, as long as they both agree.

Q: Have you ever used a song as a form of emotional revenge?
K: Oh yeah! There's a song on the Emotional Rescue album called All
About You. That's a particularly nasty song. It's like a litany of
insults. And it was written so I could get a few things off my chest.
The funny thing is that everyone assumes that it was written about
Anita (Pallenberg).
In fact, it's about Mick. I'd just come off junk and went back to
work with the Stones. In my absence Mick had been running the show. I
was ready to pick up where we left off. But in the meantime, Mick had
got used to being in charge...so, when I returned to the fold, I was
made to feel like an intruder. I got the impression that certain
people wished I was back on junk. Well, thank you very much , and
fuck you Jack!
So, you see, I had a lot of poison in my system and I had to get it
all out. But it's not all about Mick. That song is about a few other
things as well. And Anita is one of them. I was breaking up with her
around that time. I'd said, 'Look, if we clean up together, we'll
stay together'. Well, I cleaned myself up. But she didn't. And I
realized that I couldn't sleep with someone who had a needle beside
the bed. I was too fragile at that point. I loved her, but I had to
leave.

Q: Any perversions to declare?
K: Hey! Perversions are perversions. Don't knock 'em! And one man's
perversions are another man's...y'know? Whatever you can imagine,
there's someone there trying it. It all comes down to what turns you
on. Look at the Marquis de Sade. It comes down to the fact that some
one's got a problem. Loads of people have problems and they get
into some weird shit. You name it. Donkeys, sheep...it's not for me.
But, if I was a shepherd stuck up on the hills for a few months, a
sweet little lamb now and then might seem like an attractive
proposition. Let's face it. I'd like to think I could resist. It
would have to be a pretty cold winter for me to go for it. Then
again, who knows?

Q: But you draw the line at donkeys?
K: Well, not if the chick doesn't! Mind you, those donkeys don't half
pong. That's a major drawback. I met this chick in Cairo, she had a
special way with donkeys. She had no problem with it. Her conscience
was clear. The donkey didn't seem to mind. He didn't need much
encouragement, if you know what I mean!

Q: Any interesting fetishes that you'd like to share with our readers?
K: Oh, I do like the odd fetish. Lingerie is particularly nice to
look at. It's even nicer to take off. I can't say the same for my own
lingerie. But a chick's stuff - that's made to be taken off. It's
part of the courting dance. A wonderful dance it is too. There's
nothing more beautiful than a great-looking chick removing her
clothes. In fact, the only thing better is a great looking chick
removing mine.

Q: How important is sex?
K: A lot of guys take sex for granted. Arsenal 1 Newcastle Utd 4. So
fucking what, y' know?
But it's never been like that for me. It's important. 'Course it's
important. But it's always been the other things about women that
have meant a lot to me. They take care of you afterwards. You screw
them all night and they bring you breakfast in the morning. A nice
bit of toast. Whatever. It's the bits before and after that I find
particularly touching. The sex itself - it's not everything. I mean,
my dogs do it all the time. If that's all there is to it, you might
as well run into the street and find a lamp-post with a hole in it.


Q: How drastically did heroin affect you're sex life?
K: Well, it complicated things. That's for sure. Heroin made my life
difficult in a lot of ways. It's an incredible high. But when you
reach that high, the question is: what are you going to do with it?
Because what you have to do is get more out of it. And you end up
thinking like a criminal, even though you ain't. As far as I'm
concerned, it was an experiment that went on too long.

If you're asking me about sex...well, it's very hard to remember when
you're on heroin. Put it this way: it's not what you'd call an
aphrodisiac. With heroin, everything else goes on the back-burner,
and that includes sex. You have to remember that being a junkie is a
boring way of life. You don't wake up in the morning, look in the
mirror and start singing 'Oh What a Beautiful Morning'.

Q: You once remarked that the most important things in life were rock
n' roll and screwing. Do you still stand by that?
K: There's other things that are important. Like air, water and food.
but rock n' roll and screwing are easily the most enjoyable.

Q: In which order of preference?
K: Christ! That's a difficult one. Preferably both at once. I've had
some great ideas for songs when I've been screwing.
But, like I say, it's not just the screwing. I mean. that's a big part
of it. But it's more to do with the differences between men and women.
I've always found that area fascinating. It comes from growing up with
loads of women around me. Six aunts and the rest of it. I came to accept
the differences between men and women. After all, it's the differences
that make it interesting.
That for me is the great fascination about life: the mystery that lies
between man and woman. when you put it on a DNA card, there's only
a tiny difference. One little gene, that's all it is. But it's that
one little gene that makes it all work. All those differences...I've
never been afraid to celebrate those in certain songs - often with a
certain sense of humor.

Q: How would you summarize your feelings for women over the years?
K: Well, if I look back, I'm kinda happy about the fact that I never
needed to be pushy when it came to chicks. I was in the kind of
position where I could walk into a room and basically have my pick.
It's a hell of a lot easier to get laid if you're famous. But that
always seemed like a cheap shot to me. Far too easy. No appeal.

I just never had the attitude that a lot of guys have. I mean, a lot
of guys will just fuck anything, y'know? Just because it's there.
And these same guys...they never seem to learn anything about women.
Y'know, they'd be hard pushed to tell you where the clitoris is. Now
if a guy doesn't know where that is situated, then he's got a big
problem cos he ain't gonna satisfy any woman.
All I know is that I can't help guys like that. I'm not a doctor or a
gynecologist. All I know is that the chicks come back to me and say
'He was an asshole. He didn't have a clue' and I lend them my shoulder
to cry on. Now that's all I'm prepared to do. I'm not going to spend my
time drawing maps for guys who haven't learned to find their way around.
All I can say is that I haven't had any complaints. I never left a
woman feeling pissed off. I never had any woman chase me and tell me
that I'd let her down.
There's an art to that and it's an art that has to be learned.

Q: And finally Esther [or Dr. Ruth], a few words on a subject
particularly dear to our hearts. We're talking about bashing the
bishop, spanking the monkey, striking the old pink match...
K: Wanking, you mean? Nothing wrong with wanking, is there? I mean,
if a guy can't get hold of a chick, what's he supposed to do? I'll tell
you something for nothing...there's plenty of wankers in The Rolling
Stones.

Q: So we can safely conclude that Keith Richards likes a quick one off
the wrist as much as the next man?
K: Are you kidding? I'm a fucking expert when it comes to wanking.
Bloody hell. Quick ones. Slow ones. In-between ones. I've cut down a
bit recently, but I've done more than my fair share of wanking over
the years. If you're on the road and there ain't nothing left in the
bar, then you're going to seek refuge in Mother Fist and her Five
Daughters. Back to the room for a good wank. It's a lot less trouble
and there's more room in the bed.

Q: Even allowing for the donkey?
K: The donkey, the guide dog, the old march hare. I'm not fussy...
Jesus! I can't wait for this article to come out. Send me one, will you?

Keith Richards Guitar World vers 1995

Keith Richards is going to be a grandfather.

The blessed event should come later this spring, when the wife of his oldest child, Marlon, gives birth to the latest member of the Richards clan. Somehow, the notion of Keith, he of the skull-shaped ring, the wicked smile and the omnipresent bottle of Jack Daniels, as "Grandpa" is, well, odd.
"I'm joining the crowd,'' says the 52-year-old guitarist, alluding to others who have already entered the grizzled ranks of rock star grandparents--including good buddies Ringo Starr and Bob Dylan.
"I'm designing my little grandpa suit," cackles Richards. "I'll get a bag of candy in the pocket and grow a moustache or something.''
Grant Richards his good humor. He hasn't exactly called to chat about progeny, but about the Rolling Stones' bouncing new album, "Stripped." Unlike the band's last five releases, it's a live album, recorded during the European and Japanese legs of their "Voodoo Lounge" tour.
"Stripped" (Virgin) showcases the Stones playing in small clubs and even smaller rehearsal halls, though it does include its share of arena style rock--check out their anthemic, singalong version of Bob Dylan's "Like a Rolling Stone.'' For the most part, the album represents the Stones' entry into the widespread acoustic fray though, characteristically, on their own terms--not under the aegis of MTV Unplugged. The band that recorded "Country Home," "No Expectations" and "As Tears Go By" can do their own acoustic album, thank you.
"We had to do quite a lot of rehearsal to do the numbers for the theaters and clubs," Mick Jagger explains. "For those shows, we wanted a different kind of feel, a much more intimate feel. We were looking for different songs that would fit in with a different attitude.
"Doing the small shows was fun," Jagger adds. "It wasn't just for the record, you know? It gave a good vibe to the tour."
Not that "Stripped" isn't influenced by MTV's enormously popular series. Much of the album features bare-bones arrangements of familiar material--hits--including "Angie'' and a particularly searing "Street Fighting Man." Also included, however, are the kind of obscurities usually found in a box set, like the rarely heard "I'm Free,'' "The Spider And The Fly'' and "Shine A Light."
"Stripped" reminds us that the Stones are far more than the stadium rock juggernaut we've known for the past two decades. It's an important lesson. As songs like "Wild Horses" and "No Expectations" attest, the acoustic guitar has been an important part of the Stones' sound practically since their inception, and a necessary tool for conveying the country and blues roots of even their most explosive rock and roll.

GUITAR WORLD: "Stripped" is clearly a different kind of live album for the Stones. Was that the intention from the beginning?
KEITH RICHARDS: At the beginning of the tour, we realized that if we didn't watch out, we'd end up with "Voodoo Lounge Live At The Stadium." Both the band and Virgin said, "Nah, enough already." O.K., so now I've got a negative directive; I know what we don't want. But what do we want?
The germ of the idea came from rehearsals for the tour. We were rehearsing for six weeks, doing five or six, maybe 10 to 12 hours a day in there, listening to playbacks every night, just to check the sound and do the usual night watchman bit. They started to sound good. The tracks had a certain different feel--the guys think they're not recording, they're working and playing and having fun. So that's where the germ of the idea started.
GW: What made the spirit of the playing so different?
RICHARDS: Size. Most of these tracks--all but three--were done in a little room, with the whole band thrown in, no overdubs. You're live, but there's no audience. You catch the guys unaware--that's the kind of feel on it. You get a chance to play some of the old songs again, maybe put in a few licks you wish you'd put in the first time. [laughs]
GW: Like what?
RICHARDS: The original of "Street Fighting Man" is all-acoustic. Ever since then, for nearly 30 years, we've been playing it electric on stage. To be able to play that acoustically again, in its original instrumentation, that's a turn-on. I never thought I'd do that again.
GW: Ron Wood is an accomplished acoustic player, with a real acoustic soul. How much of a factor was that in deciding to do this kind of album?
RICHARDS: We're all like that. If Ronnie and I jam on the road, it's in a hotel room with two acoustic guitars. The Stones have always been that way, especially in the early days. We were a heavily acoustic band. All the songs on this album were all-acoustic in the first place. And there's plenty more. So there's no real difference for us. We're as accustomed to playing acoustic as we are electric. It's just fun to get it on tape, finally.
GW: How do you decide what songs to include on the album?
RICHARDS: You don't. You do them all and then decide what you're gonna leave off. That's when you go to the surgery and start cutting. It's better than not having enough. We had 30 or 40 songs, something like that.
We did a lot of arguing. That's a process I'd love to film with a little spy camera--the Stones sitting around a room, arguing. There's Mick in there trying to be democratic: "Put your hand up for this song, your hand up for that song." I sit in the back putting all my hands up for everything [laughs], trusting that the album will find itself in its own way. For all the lists of tunes I've ever drawn up, I don't think any albums have actually come out that way. You finish and then the record company calls and says, "Oh, we want two more tracks." Good-bye list.
GW: Did you refer much to the original versions of the songs?
RICHARDS: Just to pick up the lyrics or the odd chord change. We didn't study them or anything like that. It's 25, 30 years later; you're not going to play it the same. You wouldn't want to. But you wouldn't want to do it that differently, either. You want to remember, "What was I going for when I did it the first time?" and then do it a little more grown-up this time.
GW: The Rolling Stones, grown-up?
RICHARDS: Yeah. [laughs] The beat's more relaxed, more fluid, I think. I don't think anything's lost its edge. There's just a little more depth to everything. Mick is singing better than ever, the best I've heard him. And I've got to say, Darryl Jones--hey, this guy makes a big difference, too. You change the bass player, you're changing your engine room. But the way Darryl and Charlie hooked up from the beginning, that was a joy to me. That was a potential make-me-nervous situation; finding the right guy was all-important. Mr. Jones sounds better than I'd hoped for.
GW: The "Stripped" version of "Love In Vain," not surprisingly, brought to mind the version on "Let It Bleed." How did you develop that arrangement, which differs tremendously from the Robert Johnson original?
RICHARDS: Sometimes things just happen. We were sitting in the studio, saying, "Let's do `Love In Vain' by Robert Johnson." Then I'm trying to figure out some nuances and chords, and I start to play it in a totally different fashion. Everybody joins in and goes, "Yeah," and suddenly you've got your own stamp on it. I certainly wasn't going to be able to top Robert Johnson's guitar playing.
GW: The Stones have always done a lot of covers, but did "Love in Vain" feel a little more "holy" than others?
RICHARDS: All music is holy, you know? You can have profane versions of things. So as far as I'm concerned, you can either have a good version of a piece of music or a bad one. It doesn't matter if you change or expand it. I think if Johnson heard ours, he wouldn't turn his nose up. I think he'd prefer to be alive, too. [laughs]
GW: Much of "Stripped" has a distinctly country flavor. Who are your primary influences in that genre?
RICHARDS: [Country rock pioneer] Gram Parsons and many other guys you can pull out. Ian Stewart, too. They still join the band when we're playing, in one form or another. You carry little shades of them with you. I've listened to it since I was growing up, along with jazz and classical. It was the BBC and that was it. My mother was very musically inclined.. I grew up listening to really good music, a lot of it too sophisticated for a kid, like Sarah Vaughan, Billy Eckstine, Ella Fitzgerald and Count Basie. At the same time, we had George Jones, Ernest Tubb, Jimmie Rodgers, Hank Williams; I grew up with them as well.
So to me, country music comes quite naturally--after all, those melodies basically originate in England, Wales, Scotland, Ireland. The playing is not very difficult, it's just that the studs and rhinestones are hard to find in England! [laughs]
GW: So what is the state of the Stones these days?
RICHARDS: It's never been better, really. That's the medical bulletin today. I've never seen Charlie Watts so happy on the road; he's a happy guy, normally, but the road can get to anybody. He's brought his old lady with him more, and I think he's enjoying playing with Darryl, playing with the Stones. I think part of that comes from taking his own thing around, the jazz band. He took it around the world, and he learned a lot, found a lot more enjoyment and possibilities of playing.
And Mick is extremely charming these days, even to me. We're getting along great. The band just feels good about itself, which is why we're going back on the road.
GW: Is it possible that you guys just appreciate what the Stones are more than you have in the past?
RICHARDS: The Stones always have to look for the Stones in themselves. We're still going. People's idea of the Stones changes from when they first heard them; there's myriad ideas and concepts of what the Stones are to listeners, just depending on how long they've known us. We're constantly going forward as well, always looking for the Stones in the same way. Sometimes you screw it up, but most times it gives us some encouragement that we'll find it again. It's very much a focused band, a lot of direction and energy. You can't ask for more than that.
GW: Because you really seem focused on the Stones now, does that effect whatever need you may feel for solo projects?
RICHARDS: Yeah, in a way. But I wonder where the Stones would be if I hadn't gone solo. I learned a lot of things--about being a front man, about how tight a band can be, has to be. Maybe the Stones are tighter because of that.
GW: Does it feel like old times, with the release of "Stripped" almost coinciding with "The Beatles Anthology"?
RICHARDS: It is funny, after all these years, the Beatles and Stones going head to head again. I saw George [Harrison] in London; he was in the middle of getting it together and he came to see a show. He was bemoaning the fact that he doesn't have his band. He said, "You lucky bastards!"
GW: So what's next for the Stones?
RICHARDS: We've got these dates in Asia and whatnot, and after that, I don't know. I guess everybody will kick back for a bit, mull it over. You see what you've got and what you feel like. All I want to do is make good records--I always have. I've been very fortunate to be able to get into the studio with some good bands and do that.

Keith Richards - Guitar Player avril 1983

Keith Richards
By Tom Wheeler
From Guitar Player, April 1983

Back in 1964 when Lennon and McCartney wanted to hold your hand, Jagger and Richards were walkin' the dog. Constantly compared to the Beatles and often to the Who, the Rolling Stones staked out their original turf with gritty music and a don't-mess-with-me stance. The Beatles disintegrated a dozen years ago, and the Who say they've unpacked their road cases for the last time. The Stones are in the studio, and they're not about to bid farewell to anyone.
Keith Richards stands in the eye of the hurricane. Around him swirls a rock and roll empire with 20 years history and mystery, success and excess, acclaim and controversy. He and his mates have been called many things by discerning critics and impassioned fans. One description recurs: The World's Greatest Rock And Roll Band.
In most respects the Stones have few peers, and in terms of sheer durability they have none, having somehow survived at or near the top of the rockpile for the last two-thirds of rock and roll's entire history. They've gone the distance and still pack a heavyweight punch: Their latest albums (Tattoo You and the live concert LP Still Life) are among their most vital works, and their most recent tour was astonishingly successful--four million fans applied for the New York tickets alone. (The recent film Let's Spend The Night Together documents the 1981-1982 tour of America and Europe.)
Some reasons for all this are apparent. First, Keith's confederates could hardly be more impressive: Mick Jagger, rock's most prominent singer; guitarist Ron Wood, already a star when he joined the group in 1975; plus a drummer Charlie Watts and bassist Bill Wyman, a powerhouse rhythm section revered the world over by fans and fellow musicians alike. Other strengths are equally obvious--the consistently fine Jagger/Richards compositions, the dynamic arrangements, the meticulous recording. Just as important is the way Keith Richards changes chords from G to C.
The band is built around a two-guitar sound, itself an extension of Richards' own uniqueness. He helped blur forever the line between lead and rhythm guitar, substituting a riffing technique in which melodic embellishments are grafted onto a vigorous rhythmic treatment of chords, partial chords, and low-register lines. He often employs a 5-string open tuning (with or without capo) that facilitates adding the melodic notes to a major chord--particularly the 4th, the 6th, and the 9th. Among many examples, "Brown Sugar" is a classic killer.
Keith's most obvious influence is Chuck Berry. The original "Carol" is a textbook of Berry's double-string licks and was covered on The Rolling Stones, the debut album. Keith has had a taste for Berry flavoring ever since. Perhaps his most highly stylized nod to the St. Louis rocker is his long solo in "Bitch," where Keith repeatedly turns the beat around, turns it inside out--weaving through the horns, sneaking up on the back-beat, making the style his own.
Chuck Berry adapted boogie-woogie piano techniques for the guitar's lower register, and this distinctive two-string rhythm pattern became another Stones staple. Richards made his mark on its development by sometimes slowing it down, piledriving the downbeat, and stoking up the tone to a grand raunch: a-ronk a-ronk a-ronk.
Richards' role in the group has been analyzed countless times. The consensus: Without Keith Richards there wouldn't be a Rolling Stones. Ron Wood explains, "In other bands they follow the drummer; the Stones follow Keith, and they always have." While some have even asserted that "Keith Richards is the Rolling Stones," the guitarist himself is the first to stress that any band member's indispensability is a two-way street: "The musicians are there to serve the band. All that matters is whether something furthers the overall sound."
This cardinal principle saturates over two dozen albums as well as the band's kinetic performance onstage. It spawned not only the musicians' unqualified commitment to the group sound, but also the band's distinctive mixing technique, in which the vocals--often loosely doubled rather than neatly harmonized--are nearly drowned in the storm of guitars, bass, and drums.
Keith's vision is rooted in a keen awareness of the power of the guitar--acoustic or electric--not only as a rhythm or solo instrument, but as a musical paintbrush capable of immense sonic canvases. He conceives a complex sound and knows how to get it. And yet to him a piece of music, like a real band, is a living, breathing creature existing apart from his conception of it. So while a particular project may be planned, Keith's sense of the music's own inherent magic keeps him flexible and spontaneous, adjusting as he goes.
On many contemporary recording sessions, musicians are put in compartments to minimize leakage (one instrument "leaking" into another's microphone), and the result is a compressed sound that fills every niche. Stones records are virtual opposites, roaring with heavy artillery but airy and spacious as well. While every sound counts, the spaces, the holes, are no less important. The band's raw materials may be the deceptively simple basics of rhythm and blues, but with the air crashing around like a cyclone, the effect is complex, even abstract. (The aural impressionism was once applied to a spoken introduction. The live concert LP Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out begins with two different announcements played back simultaneously at equal volume. The result is more than the sum of the parts--sort of a verbal metaphor for the Stones mix.)
Rough edges on doubled guitars may be as important as seamless overlaps. An "extra" guitar part--mixed far in the distance to work on subconscious levels--may be as essential as obvious elements. As co-producer (credited or uncredited) on virtually every record, Keith Richards has proved to be both a master of the bold stroke and a subtle colorist, evoking not only the thunder and lightning but also a sky to put it in. For the Rolling Stones, atmosphere is everything.
For many the sound and fury of the band is a transcendental experience. Although the musicians are gifted, the songs excellent, and the recordings finely tuned, the effect is not so much that of hearing sophisticated technicians processed through state-of-the-art technology. It's more like hearing the world's greatest garage band in the world's biggest garage.
Reflecting Richards' image as a menacing bad hombre, several of the band's classic tracks begin with the hint of danger or the clang of alarm--the drums of doom heralding the "Street Fighting Man," the haunted stirrings of "Gimme Shelter," or in "Sympathy For The Devil" voodoo percussion that charges the opening line with a dark intrigue: "Please allow me to introduce myself." Anyone who has heard these songs may not be surprised to learn that on December 18, 1943, when Keith Richards was born, the night sky over the hospital was filled with sirens and anti-aircraft gunfire.
At about the age of five Keith had a conversation with another tyke who lived on the same block in Dartford, 15 miles outside of London. He told Mick Jagger that he wanted to be like Roy Rogers and play guitar.
An only child, Keith hated the discipline of school, had frequent troubles with authorities, and considered a formal education generally irrelevant. In 1956, he heard his first Elvis Presley record and received his first guitar. He preferred to let his talents develop on their own, unencumbered by a teacher's interference. Shortly after enrolling in art school, he met up again with Mick Jagger. Sharing an affection for American bluesmen such as Jimmy Reed and Howlin' Wolf, the two teenagers began jamming.
Keith and Mick met blues fanatic and multi-instrumentalist Brian Jones, and together they formed the band that Brian named the Rolling Stones, after the title of a Muddy Waters song. Wyman had joined by the winter of 1962, Watts in early '63. Needing a manager, the group hired Andrew Oldham; Like Jagger and Richards he was 19. Decca records signed the band and a couple of months before the Beatles scored their first #1 hit, "She Loves You," the Rolling Stones released their first single, Chuck Berry's "Come On," which promptly disappeared.
After gradually building a British Following over the next year, the band recorded "Not Fade Away," a Buddy Holly hit that Keith had reworked from the ground up. While the original was a jerky hillbilly bopper, the Stones' version was dark and frantic, an early mark of the mannish boy. "Time Is On My Side," which made it to the American charts, was spiked with something rarely heard in the Top 10: electric blues guitar. Early evidence of the Stones' panoramic sound appeared in "It's All Over Now" (particularly in the fade-out), and again in the first Jagger/Richards composition which Keith was fully satisfied, "The Last Time."
The Stones continued to break new guitar ground. Their first #1 single, 1965's "Satisfaction," featured one of the catchiest guitar hooks of the decade (and helped popularize the fuzztone), while the following year's "19th Nervous Breakdown" kicked off with an early example of the melodic riffing technique. Hits followed in rapid succession. A year after 1967's Their Satanic Majesties' Request, a rare departure from the Stones' R&B roots, they returned with a vengeance to the territory previously carved out in "Under My Thumb" and "Let's Spend The Night Together." The new album was Beggars Banquet. As Barbara Charone wrote in Keith Richards: Life As A Rolling Stone [Doubleday/ Dolphin]: "If Beggars Banquet belonged to anyone, it was clearly a showcase for Richards' guitar virtuosity."
For Keith, 1968's "Jumpin' Jack Flash" marked a creative surge of still greater intensity. When Brian Jones' role diminished due to a long list of problems with drugs, the law, and fellow band members, Keith began to take over more and more of the musical duties. He was introduced to Gram Parsons, a member of the Byrds and later founder of the seminal country-rock group the Flying Burrito Brothers. Gram became a close friend and profoundly influenced the Stones by teaching Keith many country songs and a variety of guitar tunings.
Brian Jones had still another liability, a drug conviction that prevented him from touring. His contributions decreased steadily, and in the summer of 1969 he was fired. The replacement was a 20-year-old Mick Taylor, a veteran of John Mayall's bands and a highly skilled blues-rock soloist who brought a new dimension to the Stones. Taylor quit the band on friendly terms after recording on over half a dozen albums, and on December 19, 1975 he was replaced by Ron Wood, a veteran of Jeff Beck's group and the Small Faces. The Stones' lineup has remained intact since then.
It's been observed that the Rolling Stones have managed to fulfill anyone's fantasy of what rock stars should be, without sacrificing ragged edges. But Keith Richards' whole career hints that the raw spontaneity is the very lifeblood of the myth. One certainty--his sidekicks and tens of millions of fans owe much to the clarity of his purpose and his orchestrations of the apocalyptic garage sound. As Peter Goddard said in The Rolling Stones: The Last Tour [Beaufort Books]: "The Stones are famous because of Mick Jagger--they're a band because of Keith Richards."
What they call the world's greatest rock and roll band is a high-performance locomotive of unexcelled durability. Up in the engine, much of the machinery runs on Keith Richards' intuition. In the world outside, the Stones and their clan have long been portrayed as exaggerating rock and roll's every outrage onto some surreal plane. (Just one example: Ordinary rockers are denounced by the local pastor; one of Jagger's girlfriends was denounced by the Archbishop of Canterbury.) Keith Richards' life is especially well suited to mythmaking and distortion, at times suggesting one long run-in with authorities interrupted by creative bursts and worldwide adulation. Tagged "the consummate Stone" by Rolling Stone magazine, he stays up for days at a time; in some photos he bears a disquieting resemblance to one of his pieces of skull jewelry. The 20 years have seen dark events--the deaths of Brian Jones and Gram Parsons, Keith's bout with heroin, endless arrests, and murder at the Altamont concert near San Francisco. Not long after his widely publicized 1977 drug trial he sang: "I'm gonna walk, before they make me run."
Claims that the gaunt guitarist is some sort of last word in decadence have filled many pages. It's open to question whether they add up to reveal more about the real Keith Richards than the first ten seconds of "Start Me Up" or the quote by a friend of Gram Parsons in Barbara Charone's book that Keith is "always the last to bed and the first up in the morning playing guitar." Many an interviewer has been startled to discover that behind the quintessential midnight rambler there is an articulate gentleman with an acute sense of artistic direction, a sharp wit, and feelings towards his kids not unlike those of any other family man. In terms of the utter loyalty to the band in which he has spent more than half his life, the man who has been accused of everything up to and including collusion with Satan is, of all things, as pure as a lily.
Up in the hotel room (classic Keith Richards--part Versailles Palace, part blues dive) Keith's dad Bert is smoking a pipe, and his son Marlon--who could dial room service before he could read--is drawing. A cassette bag is crammed with rockabilly, early Dylan, reggae, unmixed Stones, the raunchiest R&B, and more. An old Everly Brothers hit is playing, and delighted Keith Richards identifies a distinctive lead guitar lick: "Chet Atkins!" An hour later, Keith is in the corner playing piano like Ray Charles and singing ballads to himself in a voice cracked with emotion. He plays a wistful "Somewhere Over The Rainbow" and than launches into some Jerry Lee Lewis, his foot bashing the floor in tempo. Ron Wood blows in and warmly embraces his partner in guitar. In minutes the two old friends are plugged in, guitars barely in tune, jamming on a medium-tempo 12-bar blues in A. Keith leans over to the black Fender Deluxe Reverb and twists the volume knob from 2 to 6. Ron Wood grins and rips into solo. The real Keith Richards goes a-ronk a-ronk a-ronk.

Chuck Berry was a major influence on your guitar style.
That's quite a left hand he's got there [laughs].
Are the reports true that he punched you in the face?
Yeah, a little while back he did. I came up behind him to say hello. He didn't know it was me and didn't want to be bothered, but I got a nice note from him a little later, actually.
The "Bitch" solo is in a Chuck Berry style...
Which I do every night.
...and the beat turns around several times. Was that completely spontaneous, or semi-planned?
Maybe listeners knew a year or six months later that the beat turned around, but at the moment I wasn't conscious of that. It comes so naturally, as it's always happened, and it's always given that extra kick when the right moment comes back down again. That's what rock and roll records are all about. I mean, nowadays it's "rock" music. But rock and roll records should be two minutes, 35 seconds long, and it doesn't matter if you ramble on longer after that. It should be, you know--wang, concise, right there. Rambling on and on, blah blah blah, repeating things for no point--I mean, rock and roll is in one way a highly structured music played in a very unstructured way, and it's those things like turning the beat around that we'd get hung up on when we were starting out: "Did you hear what we just did? We totally turned the beat around [laughs]!" If it's done with conviction, if nothing is forced, if it flows in, then it gives quite an extra kick to it.
You turn the beat around often. There's the intro to "Start Me Up," where it turns around twice in the first ten seconds, "Little Queenie," where Charlie turns around the intro, and the end of the bass part on "Street Fighting Man," which you played yourself.
Right. You can do that in a band that's got enough confidence not to collapse when it happens. It can make things much more interesting, and it sounds great as long as nobody's fazed by it. You have to be able to keep it straight, thinking about what you're doing at the moment and also about where you're going to take it. I guess that just comes from 20 years, same location.
So many of the things you play, if you were to put them on paper and analyze them musically....
What a mess [laughs]!
For example, the opening of "Start Me Up" is a simple chord change, and yet it's recognizable as the Rolling Stones. The sound is so specific. Would altering anything about it--the echo, tone setting, string gauge--change the impact?
I just can't get the things to sound any different [laughs]. They always come out just about the same when it comes to recording, because without really thinking about it I shift slowly as I go. And no matter where I start, no matter what the guitar or the string, sooner or later I'll get to where the rest of the band is going. I eventually get back to the one kind of thing. It's sort of a trademark sound, but it's more than that because of the way I go about getting it, working it through with what's going on, rather than getting the sound first and then pushing it on the band. A lot of it is adjusting to Ronnie, and Ronnie to me, which brings a certain continuity as well as a certain flexibility.
You've often mentioned the two-guitar sound as a cornerstone of the band. On Still Life there's a different kind of interplay--probably tighter than ever.
Well, Ron's getting better [laughs]. I think that's due to the fact that Ron and I have been working together now since '75, and the more we play together the tighter we get it.
It sounds like you and he are two sides of the same coin, like you could almost change places.
We do [laughs]. If he drops a cigarette I'll play his bit, and we'll realize later that I've covered for him or he's covered for me. And you think at the time, "Oh, my God, what a gap," but when you listen to the tape, you find that it's been fixed right there at the moment, in a very un-thought-about way. We pick it up and cover each other so that sometimes you can't really tell who's playing.
When Ron joined in 1975, did the band have to make a change in the way you interact or rehearse?
No, that was the beauty of it. He was already so familiar with our stuff. After Mick Taylor left, we rehearsed for about six months with a lot of good guitar players from all over the world. And we could work with them, you know; they could work with us. But when Ronnie became available and suddenly walked in, that was it; there was no doubt. It was easy.
With Mick Taylor's style so well defined as a lead guitarist, there seemed to be a clear distinction between the two of you.
It was much harder to get a Rolling Stones sound with Mick Taylor. It was much more lead and rhythm, one way or the other. As fabulous as he is as a lead guitarist, he wasn't a great rhythm player, so we ended up taking roles. When Brian and I started, it was never like that. It's much easier than with Brian, personally. But also with Ron, the basic way we play is much more similar, and this isn't in any way to knock Mick. I mean, he's a fantastic guitar player. But even if he couldn't play shit, I'd love the guy. But chemically we didn't have that flexibility in the band. It was, "You do this, and I'll do that, and never the twain shall meet." With Ron, if he drops his pick, then I can play his lick until he picks it up, and you can't even tell the difference.
Had you and Ron worked together very much before he joined the group?
Yes, for about 18 months. And I did a lot of work on Ronnie's first and second solo albums. He's never been the same since.
Have you found that your styles affected each other, now that you've been working together for several years?
Yeah, that's what's great about it. I neglect something, and he makes up for it. That's the great thing about two guitar players, because if you get it right, you know when to lift one of his licks, and vice versa, without thinking about it. He lifts more of mine than I do of his [laughs].
When the two of you are onstage, how much of your interaction is subject to change?
It depends on the sound system. If you're going to make a change, you need to hear what you're doing in the first place, so a lot of that gets down to technicalities of the stage monitoring. On our last tour in '81 we had those long ramps out to the sides of the stage. The idea of having that stage is to get out where most performers don't get with audiences of that size. Well, if the monitors aren't working out there, and you're just making signs at the sound guys instead of concentrating on your playing, then you forget it, just leave it. But if the sound's good and you can hear everything, then you tend to give it a bit more, adjust more to what's going on, change as you go.
Do you have much trouble communicating onstage at that volume?
It's all done by semaphore and eye signals. It's the only way you can really do it. But the thing is, there isn't that much need for communication or looking at each other, except when things go wrong. Otherwise the communication is just through the music. But if things are going wrong, then everybody's looking at me: "How's he going to get out of this?"
Your records have sort of an indoor sound, the effect of enclosed space. Are you happy with your outdoor concert sound?
Never totally satisfied with live things, no. If you were, you wouldn't keep trying to make it better. But I'm not disappointed with it. You just look forward to being able to do it better. You're always wondering about the people way at the back, what they're hearing. There are so many people and they're so far away--you have no idea what's being heard out there. You're hoping for the best and taking it for granted that the sound crew are doing the job for you and giving out the sound onstage as much as possible to everywhere in the place. But there's the one problem, always that nagging doubt there--they're not all getting it the way they should.
Your live versions of songs are often faster than their studio counterparts--for example, "Shattered" on Still Life. Is that intentional, to make it more exciting for the audience, or is it the adrenaline of performing?
It's the tempo of the whole gig, the adrenaline--especially the huge gigs. The show just takes its own speed from the start, and you go with it. It might be great or it might be terrible, but the tempos one night may be twice as fast as the night after. And you can always learn when you listen back, you see? You may find, "Wow, that should've been that tempo all along--we made the record too slow [laughs]!"
On the live version of "Just my imagination," in the second half the guitar figure changes some notes and sustains others for a country feel, almost like a pedal steel feeling.
That's Ron and me doing the parts together, and you get that sustaining thing like that. We aren't using a pull-string or a lot of slide right now, but Ron plays pedal steel, a bit on "Shattered" and "Faraway Eyes." Country music's a part of the way we do that kind of thing, and it comes through even if it's done with straight guitars sort of pulling up against each other.
Isn't there some slide in "Neighbours" on Tattoo You?
No, but it sounds like it. Ron plays that solo, and a lot of his things on regular guitar sound like they're slide. He's wangled a way of playing it without them, because he keeps losing them [laughs]. At the start of that solo he's bending about four strings. Sounds like slide.
On Still Life's "Let Spend The Night Together," is that a 12-string doubling the vocal melody on the interlude, which ends with "keep on smilin' baby"?
That's one reason we haven't done that one a lot on stage--we could never figure a way 'round that middle bit. No 12-string--just the two run-of-the-mill guitars together, doin' it tight.
The mix of the two guitars on Still Life adjusts in places to the parts you're playing. Is that sort of detail up to your discretion?
Well, I listen for those things, but I may not be there for the first mix. Especially with live stuff, I'd rather let the guy who recorded it get his work into it. Then I get sent the dubs. From the whole tour you have several takes of each song to pick from. The set opened with "Under My Thumb," and it's hard to get the right take, because you're playing right there early, when everybody's trying to get together and nobody knows what's going on. Every night it takes 15 minutes for the sound guys and the recording guys and everybody to fall in and get adjusted, so choosing the take for the first number requires a bit of work. The endings, too. You always wish you could get a couple of takes of the beginning and ending of a show as good as it is in the middle. But every night it's a different problem; you're in a different place, so you see what happens when you get going and take it from there.
On recent tours you've taken occasional breaks from the outdoor arenas, getting into clubs. Do you miss the smaller venues?
Yeah, always. You hate to do the same thing all the time. I love playing the ballparks and the domes, you know. For the satisfaction of the band it gives you a terrific buzz--so many people. But by doing just one thing all the time you forget how to do anything else. You just become good at playing the domes and never learn anything else again. And I've always found that if you put in a few 3,000-seaters on the tour, and even 300, it gives the band itself a confidence quite apart from anything else. Then you can deal with 300 people or 90,000 and know how to play it. And probably the band feels that working in one of the nice old places like the Fox Theater in Atlanta is kind of more satisfying most of the time.
Because of the immediacy?
Yeah. The sound isn't dissipated totally, and you don't have to worry about the wind factor and things like that. It's much simpler and easier to get--it's just [snaps fingers] turn it up, get to it.
Didn't you change to Mesa/Boogie amplifiers on this last tour?
The '81 tour of the States was the first time we used the big Mesa/Boogie amp and speaker setups on the road, but we've been using Boogie amps in the studio since about '77, and on the stage since the '78 tour, slaving small Boogies through Ampeg cabinets.
Do you pay much attention to speakers?
No. I only think about them when I don't like 'em. If I plug in and to me it sounds like crap, then I ask a question, but otherwise, I leave it, because there are guys far more versed. I don't know what speakers are coming out every year. I find something and I stick with it for five or six years. It's like some of the gadgets I use. Guys who work with us and are close to us, like the crew, will say, "You should try this: I think this is going to add to what you're doing." I might try it, although I don't go around looking at specifications and all that.
Were you using any effects onstage in '81?
An MXR analog delay on a few numbers, and a phaser on "Beast Of Burden" and on or two others.
How about the very unusual sound on "Shattered"?
That was the MXR phaser--the 100 model--and I damped the guitar. That's what gives it that sound on the studio version as well.
What kind of wireless systems were you and Ron using on the last tour? Can you get the right tones as easily?
We've been using Nady wireless things since '78, and the tone is a lot better, because cords get stepped on and knotted up and they start rattling a little bit, and you lose tone.
In the last few years there's been a new aspect of your tone--more distinct, with a slight click, almost like a slap bass in rockabilly. "Hang Fire" and "She's So Cold" are examples, and especially the last section of "Little T&A."
It's our equivalent of that rockabilly thing. I think you'll find that comes from using a lot of analog delay on Ron's guitar or my guitar or both of them, and I dampen it. That'll give you that ticka-tacka-ticka. I always use that green MXR analog delay. I'm told it's quite out of date now and old-fashioned, but I got it free and I forgot that time marches on and they make better ones or so they say. I don't know. I've worked very well with those MXR things, and they've been very reliable.
Which guitar are you playing for that sort of stripped-down rockabilly sound on "Little T&A"?
A Telecaster, a '57 set up in 5-string tuning. It's open G 5-string, without the heavy string. Right there from the bottom up it's: G, D, G, B, D. The whole idea of getting rid of the sixth string in the open tuning was having the root on the bottom.
The suspended chords in the verses of that song are typical of your riffing style.
That's just one of the things you can do with open tuning. You can get a drone going so you have the effect of two chords playing against each other. One hangs on because you've just got to move one finger--or two at the most--to change the chord, so you've still got the other strings ringing. It's a big sound.
Mick was using an Ovation Adamas steel-string on the tour. Were you satisfied with the instrument's performance?
I think they're very nice-sounding guitars. A nice neck. But I can never get used to that shape, that... dish. They're probably the best way of amplifying an acoustic guitar and having it still sound like an acoustic. There's no doubt. Probably a million readers will write in and say the Stones don't use acoustic guitar that much onstage, so we don't know shit, but for what we need, for a couple of numbers, it's adequate.
How did you come about acquiring your new guitars?
Friends of mine introduced me to Doug Young, who built them. After seeing some of his things, I knew he was capable of exceptionally fine work, so I more or less commissioned him to build me a guitar. He ended up making me two--the red one is a gift for my girlfriend, actually. Basically, that's the lowdown.
Did you specify exactly what you wanted?
Not really. We didn't have to say very much about it. I was very impressed by the things I saw, and I wanted a similar guitar for myself. But it's also this patronage that players and builders can get involved with--Renaissance man, and all that, the old system of someone like me encouraging guys like Doug. His guitars are too good not to be given help.
So you didn't request a certain wood for the fingerboard, a certain pickup design?
Not too much, no. I said, "Make me a guitar." I figure that's the difference between working with an artist as opposed to just anyone. I mean, if you want a suit made, you don't want to have to tell the tailor how to do everything. You want to find someone who doesn't need all that, you see? It's more, "I want to see what you can build for me." There are very few people like that. Most people, you have to sit on their ass and watch them: with Doug I just left him to it. I was in Paris for months, recording. I'd almost forgotten it was going on until I saw what he'd done.
Have you had a chance to play them in the studio yet?
Not in the studio, but I went out and banged on them a bit. I'll be back in the studio soon, and then we'll beat them into shape [laughs].
After playing hundreds of guitars, what quality in these instruments made you take notice?
It's a recognition you develop. I think, and I'm sort of instinctive about these things--sit down and play it, feel it. I knew that Doug was thinking along the same lines as myself, but far ahead, because I'm not technical. Only after the event of building it when I've got it in my hands, can I know what's right. I can't say, "Well, it was the magnificent electronics," or "the wonderful bonding of the woods," and each specific thing. It was simply a fine instrument. Lovely wood!
Can you judge the sound of an electric before you plug it in?
Maybe to a certain extent. If the neck and the action feel right, you're more than halfway home, even before hearing the electronics. Things like weight and the density of the wood indicate certain things, but you simply need to play it to really tell. And it doesn't take long.
On record you've used several very different types of guitars--Gibson Les Pauls and ES-335s, Fender Telecasters, and others. And yet a listener can tell right away that it's you, from stylistic clues, but also from the sound alone.
I use a whole load of different guitars, that's true, but they're not all that dissimilar in type. I mean, ninety percent are probably Telecasters, old ones, but more than that, you can't really separate style and sound, you see. People do separate them when they're talking about music, but all of that often misses the whole point.
You're suggesting that the style is the sound?
Yes, part of it, more than any particular tone setting or pickup or anything like that. I'll just adjust to the sound of the track as we go--the sound of the bass drum and especially Ronnie's guitar. The style is adjusting along with the sound. There's never a conscious effort to get that "Honky Tonk Woman" tone or a thing like that. You may get it or you may not. But that's not what you're thinking about. You're thinking about the track.
Some people were amazed to read in your first Guitar Player cover story that on "Street Fighting Man" there are no electric guitars.
Two acoustics, one of them put through the first Philips cassette player they made. It was overloaded, recorded on that, and then hooked up through a little extension speaker, and then onto the studio tape through a microphone.
You've paid quite a bit of attention to acoustic guitars in rock music.
Well, I started on acoustic guitar, and you have to recognize what it's got to offer. But also you can't say it's an acoustic guitar sound, actually, because with the cassette player and then a microphone and then the tape, really it's just a different process of electrifying it. You see, I couldn't have done that song or that record in that way with a straight electric, or the sustain would have been too much. It would have flooded too much. The reason I did that one like that was because I already had the sound right there on the guitar before we recorded. I just loved it, and when I wrote the thing I thought, "I'm not going to get a better sound than this." And "Jumpin' Jack Flash" is the same, too. That's acoustic guitar.
Early Everly Brothers records have huge acoustic guitar sounds. Were any of them influential?
Yeah, all of their records, and also there's the fact that the first major tour we ever did was supporting the Everly Brothers, Little Richard, and Bo Diddley. Plenty to learn [laughs] in a real short time, following those guys around. The Everlys came on with just their trio and themselves, and it was great. On their recordings there is a certain power in the steel-string. It's a different instrument from electric--not that different in the way you play it, but in terms of the sound. There are times when an acoustic guitar will make a track. You'll be despairing, nothing working, hashing away, Take 43 on electric guitar, and somebody will say, "Why don't you try it on acoustic?" And you try it one time and you've got it.
What kind of acoustics do you like to use?
Old Martins--several types of them--and certain Gibsons, particularly old Hummingbirds.
Do you have a certain kind of room that you like to record in?
Yes, but it's hard to tell whether it'll work until we get in there. And when we find a room I hate to lose it. Over the years we've been through four or five or maybe more of these ace rooms. Sometimes you walk in and it just happens, but whether it takes a long time or not to produce the sound you want, you don't want to lose it. We're still working in the same place now that we've been in since Some Girls, a good big room. Pathe Marconi is the name--it's EMI's studio in Paris. The room we use is what they consider their sort of storeroom for the orchestra, or a rehearsal place. It's not Studio A, B, or C. It doesn't even have a number.
How important is the sound of the room itself?
The room is as important as the band and the producer and the song and the engineer. The room is at least as important as all that to the total sound. You can't separate rock and roll music instrument by instrument. You destroy the whole structure of it. Rock and roll music can only be recorded by jamming the sound all together.
One you've got something to work right in the studio, do you try to use all the same equipment onstage?
Yeah, pretty much, just a larger version. I've never found the Stones or anybody else made great records by using huge stacks in the studio and blasting away. You can get very powerful sounding records playing very quietly, and with relatively small amps. Small amps turned way up have the tension you're trying to get anyway, and it sounds big. It also gets back to that recognition of the acoustic guitar and what it can do, and what you can get if you're thinking of the mix right from the beginning and all the way through the recording.
Years ago the mixing technique on many of your records broke quite a few rules. Did you realize from the outset of your career that a new way of mixing would be necessary?
We knew we wanted it without knowing the way to get it. It was just what sounded right to us, and also because we were brought up in the era when a four-track was a rarity. We started recording at a point when the best sound you got was all air and all the room sound and everything was leakage and jammed together, and the vocal fought its battle with the rest of the instruments. We tried it the usual way, but whenever we brought the vocals up we'd never like the mix as much. What always amazed me was that if the record was popular, most people would know the words--at least the key ones--within a few weeks, no matter how much the voice was buried. Years back, in the studio, I always thought about those other records where the voice was too far forward, so you never really got a sound. You just got a vocalist with some accompaniment.
Which wasn't what you were after?
Not for us, but you see, you've got to treat each type of music in the appropriate fashion. I mean, if you're mixing the Everly Brothers, then you've got those fantastic goddamn voices and you put them out front as much as you can! But even those guys never sacrificed the sound of the record for the sound of their voices. They had it all there, quite a light sound, but always very powerful as well, never wimpy.
Did record companies ever tell you or your producers and engineers that you should be mixing Mick Jagger like the Everly Brothers?
They'd try, but we set it up so there was no way they had anything to say about it. They'd complain, and we'd tell them to fuck off.
Do you ever splice takes, either rhythm tracks or solos?
Sometimes. Not so much on solos. We tend to record them real long--go on and on, but as long as I know that somewhere in that seven or eight or eleven minutes there is that two-and-a-half minutes that says it all, then I don't mind going on, because I'll ferret it out and find it.
Is it too soon to start talking about what's on the next album?
I can only report that it's going magnificently for us, so much stuff coming out and starting to sound real good. We've only been in the studio a little over two weeks, which is only like a warm-up, and we've cut about a dozen cassettes of tape already. Everybody's happy about it. When we're done, we'll start thinking about the next tour.
In the choruses of "Honky Tonk Woman" and "Start Me Up," the bass leaves huge holes for the guitars to fill. Does Bill Wyman get a lot of direction from you in that regard, or is that something he's always done on his own?
I would say in the late '60s, early '70s, Bill would be given more direction--not always the right direction [laughs]--but Mick and I would be more inclined to say, "Do this and that." Sometimes he comes and asks, but less and less. You know, relationships change. But Bill, he's kind of like Charlie. He just keeps [long pause] amazing me. He just keeps getting better. He's not always what I'm expecting. I know he's good, and he's always there. But I kind of take his playing for granted. And then when I listen to what he's doing, I realize he's not always playing the same thing. He's much better than we think. You see, we're the worlds worst Rolling Stones critics [laughs]. We tear the shit apart before anybody gets a chance to hear it.
Do you practice very much aside from band rehearsals for tours or recording sessions?
In a way I do, because the guitar is always there, and I always play it or the piano. I do it in bursts. You kind of wait for it. You can't force it and sit down and say, "Now I'm going to write a hit song."
You've recorded a lot of material on your own--just vocals with piano or guitar. Do you plan to ever release any of it?
No, not releasing it as such. I just do it because I like to play a lot of great songs for myself, and it helps me to write. The way I write songs is to sit down and play 25 great songs by other people and hope that one of mine drips off the end.
Have many of the songs that you've written for the Stones been composed on the piano?
Sometimes, yeah. I'm such an amateur on piano, and that can help. You play guitar every night and get to know it so well, and a lot of great songs are really accidents. On the piano I may come across something I wouldn't have done on guitar.
You've sung lead on some of the band's hits, and sang "Little T&A" on the last tour, but none of your lead vocals are included on the album.
Well, if I sing the lead vocals, then what's he going to do [laughs]? There's quite a bit for each of us to think about already. And I do sing lots of parts with Mick, always.
For years Mick has been reported to be a proficient guitar player, and yet he only started to play a lot onstage during the Still Life tour. Why now?
I think he feels a little more confident about it. He's a fine drummer, too. And he's not bad on keyboards, in his own way--in the same way that I am, fiddling about to write and to get some interesting ideas. One thing that's held Mick back with guitar onstage is that playing is one thing; knowing how to get an instantly good sound off the amp is another. That is something he's still got to work on. It keeps him back from doing so much, because if it doesn't sound good to him in the first six bars, he doesn't have the experience and the knowledge of dealing with the amplifier. He might be playing great, but he's got a shitty sound on the amp--and then he's got his singing to think about.
Are you playing much National or Dobro these days?
Not doing as much of that as I'd like--that goes with not living anywhere in particular. You need to sort of sit down every day and do that. I hate to travel with instruments like that. I think you just need a certain environment when you're playing like that, and since that's not the way we are able to live, and probably wouldn't anyway, I don't get as much of a chance. You know, some things you don't get as much of a chance to do as you wish you had.
For young guitarists who are into Chuck Berry or the Rolling Stones today, what do they face, trying to make records now? Compared to when you started, what's different?
24-track machines. Otherwise, not that much has changes from what we faced. There's all this stuff about new equipment and changing styles and all that, but the point is, you still face a lot of rip-off artists, and you face a lot of work.
You and Pete Townshend seem to have much in common, at least on the surface--the components of your styles, your use of the guitar, the way your bands are compared in the press. Do you feel any particular kinship with him?
You mean Trousers? Now let me see--one reason for that is probably that we started playing the same clubs almost at the same time. I never took credit for this, but apparently he said that he lifted that arm swing he does from seeing me. I don't recall doing it, but I guess if he says so, he did. It's something I've never been aware of. In certain respects, yeah, we're both coming out in the same place at the same time, more than anything else.
He was quoted as saying that there comes a time for a band to retire, to pass on the torch, so to speak, to younger bands.
I love Peter, but the time to stop is when you can't do it anymore, or when you're fed up. There's no passing on of the goddamn torches. Other people will pick them up anyway, and besides, that's not the point. I don't know if he was accurately quoted, but other people have said it anyway when they can't think of anything else to say. You see, if rock and roll is what you do, then that's what you do, and that's all. You don't sort of say, " Oh, now I give up and I'll hand it on to this band who I think is quite good." You don't hand it on that way. Pete already handed it on, the same as we did, to some young guys that are playing now, the way we played Chuck Berry. It's not, "here, I've got to hand you a document." It's the records that you've done that the younger players have listened to and grown up with and sat around learning.
What would you like to be doing a year from now?
Accepting a platinum record, for one thing [laughs]. I'd like nothing to change too much, just to do what we do, but be able to do it better.
After one of your court trials you commented on systems of justice and juries of your peers, and how that all related to being a musician.
Yeah, I was trying to make the point that when I am thrown in a court, or anybody like myself is thrown in court, the jury has got absolutely no experience in the musician's way of life, so they're not your peers. I know justice is often rough and so on, but they don't know what it's like to be on the road for 20 years, and I can't explain it to them now. So I was saying, give me a jury of my peers, with Chuck Berry, with Muddy Waters. And put Ron in there, too [laughs]--I mean, I can drop him a few bucks.
People keep calling you the world's greatest rock and roll band, and they have been for a long time.
It's embarrassing.
Are there any drawbacks to their saying that?
Yeah, you've gotta keep being it [laughs]! I've decided that every night there's another world's greatest rock and roll band, because one night somebody has an off gig, and some other shit band has a great gig. That's one of the great things about rock and roll--every night there's a different world's greatest band. We've been maybe a little more consistent, for whatever reason, mainly when we're going together on a tour and also because we've managed to stick together. The chemistry--that's got nothing to do with musicianship. It's got to do with personality and characters and being able to live with each other for 20 years.
People have been predicting the end of the Stones...
...from the beginning [laughs]!
With the kind of life you seem to lead, longevity might appear to be the last thing you'd be able to gain. What's the secret?
The secret is, there is no secret. It's finding people that not only play well with you, but that you can get along with. There's no constant battle about who's Mister Big, none of those problems. When I see Charlie and Bill--I ain't seen 'em for a few weeks--it's like a pleasure. Ron says we're his closest friends. I guess that's the only secret.
Is that what it means to play in a band?
Most people don't know what a band is. People have heroes, and they copy them--I mean, we copied things very carefully when we started. But you don't get this picture and then do everything to fit it. You do what you do. The musicians are there to contribute to the band sound. The band isn't there for showing off solos or egos. A lick on a record--it doesn't matter who played it. All that matters is how it fits. The chemistry to work together like that has to be there. You have to work on it, always--figure out what to do with it. But basically it's not an intellectual thing you can think up and just put there. It has to be there. You have to find it.

Keith Richards Melody Maker janvier 1979

An Outlaw At The Ritz: Keith Richards
Chris Welch, Melody Maker, 13 January 1979
In which Keef holds up the price of Smirnoff shares, little Marlon holds up his Dad, Anita Pallenberg holds up the interview, and CHRIS WELCH holds his own.
UP AT THE Ritz Hotel in Piccadilly, the air of 19th century opulence and grandeur extends to the elevators, which are paneled in polished wood. On the surface of the lift that carried me to the fourth floor, someone had scratched "Rolling MOSS!" It was a petty piece of vandalism which hinted at the dark conspiracies that still seem to surround the Rolling Stones.
Who, on this freezing January night, would know that one of the last folk heroes of rock’n’roll was in residence? Who would inscribe strange messages for him — friend or foe?
Outside the double doors of Keith’s suite, one could hear the familiar sound of a rock band in occupation of expensive territory: ‘phones ringing, a tape machine relaying insidious reggae, girlish cries, and repeated clamours for room service.
It suddenly occurred to me I hadn’t interviewed Keith Richards since 1966. And that was in a hotel room too, with Mick Jagger, talking about Between The Buttons. The weird thing was, Keith seemed to think it had been only yesterday.
Keith, not long freed by a Canadian court on drug charges, a onetime heroin addict who now keeps life at bay with hearty draughts of vodka, is an extraordinarily charming man, possessing infinite patience. While his speech and thoughts are sometimes held in check by the flow of soporifics and stimulants holding their own press conference inside his head, his acerbic wit and hard-bitten worldly wisdom remain intact.
Roaming the suite were Barbara Charone, the American journalist, just completing her forthcoming book on Keith’s life, and the remarkable Anita Pallenberg, Keith’s lady, who is described in Anthony Scaduto’s book on Jagger as "a very wicked lady, not human, extrahuman." I had a taste of the alleged wickedness when Anita set about systematically destroying the interview.
But even Anita, at her most irritating, was often very funny, and the dialogue between the pair was often more illuminating than the polite record of intentions.
Another member of this strange little circle was Marion, Keith’s and Anita’s nine-year-old son, a bright, good-looking kid who seemed more together than any of us. He’ll make a fine tour manager one day.
Despite the inroads on his stamina made by the vodka, Keith was keen to talk about anything. It was not until a few hours had elapsed that one realised that he had been packing away enough liquor to fell a fair-sized ox.
"I don’t want no tea, or coffee," he told Barbara at one point. "I just want this bottle."
KEITH: All right, leave me to it, you’ve heard it all before.
ANITA: I haven’t heard it all before.
MM: Can we turn the music down a little bit?
KEITH: Sure!
(The conversation begins, but there is a flow of interruption from Anita, as we talk cursorily about last year’s American tour. Eventually Keith betrays impatience, as Pallenberg answers yet another question for him.)
KEITH: Look, darling, will you please shut up!
(His remonstrance has little effect and she keeps up a heavy barrage of Anglo-German mutterings.)
KEITH: Back to my train of thought. That was a really good tour, especially the small theatres. We didn’t know half of them existed. The Palladium in New York was great. That was the last playing we did, apart from a thing at the Bottom Line with Nick Lowe, which was to celebrate my freedom. What I’m doing here is taking a look at the old country. It’s two years since I’ve been here, and I couldn’t stand the idea of having another American Christmas...you know, there’s nothing more disturbing than two chicks whispering to each other.
(Keith looked crossly towards Barbara and Anita, ensconced on the couch and giggling.)
ANITA: Oh, Just throw me out. Don’t mind it. I mean...y’know...all that about the Palladium, that’s OLD stuff.
MM: We were just recapping.
ANITA: Keith — he’s got future plans, I tell you.
MM: I’m sure we’ll get to that.
KEITH: Now I’ve gotta think of something.
ANITA: Throw me out if you want to. (She clings firmly to the sofa.)
KEITH: I don’t want it to get that far. I was saying, I came home to see my folks, which I haven’t done yet. I still have a house here, at Redlands, but due to the quirks of the IRS (Inland Revenue Service), I’m not allowed to stay in it. I can look over the fence, and say, "Oh what a nice house, I wish I could go in there." I’m allowed 90 days a year in the country. I thought if you stayed away two years you could have 180 days the third year, but it doesn’t work like that.
MM: What have you missed about England?
KEITH: I missed the sarcastic coppers...I’m probably a little out of touch with the music here, but most of the stuff that’s happening here has lost touch with itself anyway. It’s back to fads. One minute it’s Bay City Rollers, then it’s Punk Rock, then it’s Power Pop or New Wave, then that’s finished...people are back to sticking labels on things. Elvis Costello. I’ve ‘eard his stuff. I’d sooner see him live, that’s all I care about. I don’t care about album production. I like Ian Dury, he’s down to the bone. As long as there’s something happening here, that’s all that really matters. Where they went wrong with the punk thing was they were trying to make four-track records on 32-track. We were trying to do the same thing in a way. We tried to make 1964 sound like 1956, which wasn’t possible either. But we did end up with something that was our own. The gap between ‘76 and ‘62 as far as recording technology was concerned, was too big. I think Punk Rock was great theatre, and it wasn’t all crap. But at the beginning I saw the Sex Pistols on TV trying to think of a few extra swear words in front of Grundy, and I thought their vocabulary was rather limited. But I’ve no doubt they’ve learnt a few words since then. The music was all incidental, like background music. You just had to see it.
ANITA: Mumble, mumble.
KEITH: Look darling, who’s doing this interview?
ANITA: I am!
KEITH: The problem is if two people talk at once, you don’t hear anything.
(Anita’s noisy demands that the conversation should turn to future plans were now impossible to ignore.)
MM: Are you planning a solo album?
KEITH: It just so happens that I’ve met a few people during the past year or so, and we’ve got together and put some stuff on tape. That’s as far as it goes, and whether it comes out or not is another thing. They’ve put a single out in the States of ‘Run, Run Rudolph’ with ‘The Harder They Come’, and...er...no one likes it. It’s the first time I’ve put a record out, and it was cut at Island in Hammersmith two years ago. It hasn’t been released here; we’re letting the Americans suffer first.
ANITA: I find that very significant.
KEITH: Jolly good.
MM: But are you hoping to get a solo album out?
ANITA: Yes.
KEITH: No...certain executives are. I don’t give a shit. I’ve got some stuff but I don’t know if roots reggae is what people want to hear from me. That’s most of the stuff I’ve done while playing with Tosh’s band in Kingston. Either I cut some more to make enough for an album or I leave it in the warehouse. I dunno — I can’t think about an album until I’ve got the whole thing in front of me. The only thing that stops me is that...
ANITA: The only thing that stops me is that I need the whole thing in front of me...
KEITH: Look, go and read your scripts. When I’ve got an album’s worth of material in front of me, then I’ll think about it. I’ve got Robbie Shakespeare on bass. Sly Dunbar on drums, plus two percussion men, Ansel Collins on organ, Robert Lynn on piano and Big Mao on guitar.
MM: Do you get the same satisfaction from reggae that you got from R&B back in the ‘60s?
KEITH: Yeah, I find that I’m drawn to it for the same reasons, and because there’s nothing happening in black American music. There’s probably more happening in white American music at the moment. They’re going through the formula disco phase, and of course it’s very popular so it’s no wonder people are drawn to it. The temptation to make those records is so strong.
MM: Do Rastafarians accept you, as a white musician playing reggae?
KEITH: As far as I’m concerned, I’m not white and they’re not black. It’s just something you don’t think about. They make me feel very comfortable when I’m on their turf and I do the best to make them feel the same.
MM: Do you have to adapt your style much to play reggae?
KEITH: Not much, I’ve been going to Jamaica for over ten years. ‘67 was the first visit and in ‘72 we lived there for a whole year. Ever since then I’ve had a house there. We lived on the beach for a long while before we realised it’s the dumb thing to do. Everything goes rusty from the salt, from your guitar strings to the Range Rover. The hip thing to do is live on the other side of the road, on top of the cliff where you get a breeze even when it’s really hot. People may say: "Oh, now he’s doing his reggae bit." I’ll go the whole way with it or just record it for fun and put it in the vaults, until it’s acceptable to everybody. Five years ago there were people who said they could never get behind reggae...
ANITA: Like Keith Richard.
KEITH: Thank YOU darling... okay, fuck off.
ANITA: You baam claat man.
MM: What DOES that mean?
KEITH: It was a cloth that they used to mop up the blood after whipping a slave.
MM: Good grief.
KEITH: That’s one interpretation, but every other Rastafarian will tell you another.
(The conversation mysteriously got on to the subject of the toothless whores of Kingston, and we mentioned that until recently Keith had been conspicuous by his deficiencies in the molar department.)
KEITH: Miraculously, due to abstinence and prayer, my teeth grew back! I think I was just late developing. Nothing an expensive operation couldn’t prolong. Considering all the thumping hearts of the last year, I feel quite good: But I don’t feel that a great weight has been lifted from my mind. They’ve put in an appeal in Canada, so we’re back to square one. I don’t have to go through the whole, case again, but if the appeal judge says the trial judge was wrong, then I’m back where I started. But I never thought much about it anyway, not until I had to go to Canada and stand in the dock. It was very boring having to sit there and listen to it all. I thought the judge was fair and that the Canadians knew enough to leave well alone. Now they’ve turned it into a stupid internal squabble. It’s Canada v. The Rolling Stones. The trial judge did his best to please everybody. I don’t have to make any more appearances, only in concert in front of the blind. How can you appear in front of the blind? But whoever I have to play for, the blind, deaf or bubonic plague vicitims, I’ll do what I’ve always done anyway. I’m leaving it all to the people who set shows up, but I guess it’ll end up in Maple Leaf Gardens. We’ll do it, probably with the Stones, and Peter Tosh.
ANITA: Sid Vicious will be the next.
KEITH: Sid — yeah. He’s been a silly boy. Just because he woke up with a knife in his hands, he thinks he done it. I have a feeling he didn’t. It was probably some very sharp New York dealer. Nobody deserves a trial, whether it’s in Canada or New York. I mean, I didn’t screw Margaret Trudeau. Ah, hah! But in that case — who did? Who ripped the flimsy bathrobe aside? I end up feeling that I have to pay for the Rape of Canada. But I didn’t have nuthin’ to do with it. And as far as I could see they were after Trudeau anyway, because you’ve got a civil war brewing there. Both sides were trying to use me as part of their internal conflict. But they’re the bastards that make us all-important. It’s not as if I, or anybody involved with us, has ever gone around saying, "Oh it’s great to be on dope. Everybody should do it." Whatever my lifestyle is, or whatever my problems, I don’t encourage others to follow me. Thinking about the bust, what disappointed me was that not one of them was wearing a proper Mounties uniform when they burst into my hotel room. They were all in Anoraks with droopy moustaches and bald heads. Real WEEDS, the whole lot of ‘em, all just after their picture in the paper. Fifteen of ‘em, round me bed, trying to wake me up. I’d have woken up a lot quicker if I’d seen the red tunic and Smokey Bear hat. I was taken down to the jail and I asked them to give me a couple of grammes back, just to tide me over.
MM: Do you ever regret starting to take drugs?
KEITH: No, I don’t regret nothin’. I just got bored with it [heroin]. It would take more than the Mounties to turn me off something, if I really wanted to stay on it. Because I know damn well that in those pens (penitentiaries), you can get as much as you want. The first day in Wormwood Scrubs, during the first exercise period, I was tapped on the shoulder and some geezer said: "Want some hash?" I said: "Lay off! I wanna get out of here!" That was years ago. Can you imagine what it’s like now? All you’ve gotta do is bend over twice or have the right amount of tobacco, and you’ve got whatever you want. I still remember that fucking screw at the Scrubs, when Mick picked me up in me Bentley — which was a bit much, he should have used a minicab — I remember the screw shouting at the gates, "You’ll be back, we’ll get ya!" You were in Rome doing Barbarella, darlin.’ (Keith addressed Anita, still keeping up her monologue from the sofa) while I was doing time.
ANITA: Na, na, na, na, na.
KEITH: Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes — we won’t talk about that anymore. We’ll argue about that later.
MM: Do you feel healthier now?
KEITH: Different. I suppose you could say healthier, although I must say, in all fairness to the poppy, that never once did I have a cold. I’m gonna blurt it out now, right? The cure to the common cold is there — but, of course, they daren’t let anybody know because you’d have a nation full of dope addicts. This winter I’ve had two colds. But I don’t recommend drugs to anybody. What’s really wrong is 12-year-old kids on the street scoring dope that’s got strychnine thrown in, to give you extra flash for fun. That’s wrong, because it retards you. I know one junkie in London who started at 14, and kicked the habit when he was twenty. And then his voice broke. It slows down the metabolism. The worst thing is the ignorance of people taking things without knowing what they’re doing.
MM: And you need the appropriate lifestyle and freedom to be able to indulge.
KEITH: I don’t know if it’s that. Half the reason I got drawn into it was because I didn’t have a lot of freedom and time off. If I’d have had the freedom and time I could have dragged myself off to somewhere remote for three months and cleaned myself up and pulled myself together. But in this business, you find there’s always something that has to be done, a new tour or whatever, and before you know it, five years has gone.
MM: Did coming off drugs affect the way you play or write?
KEITH: I would like to say...hum...actually, after watching stuff I’ve done when I know I was out of my brain, and don’t even remember the show, da da dum...not really. I mean, I’d like to say it did, to encourage anybody to get off it, but the only difference, now I’m off it, is I enjoy what I do much more. Also I can remember enjoying it. One show was just like another...it was like a tunnel that got smaller and smaller.
(Keith ruled out the possibility of his doing shows on his own outside of the Stones, and talked about his working relationship with Mick Jagger.)
KEITH: For what I do and for what the rest of the band does, I don’t think I could do it any better elsewhere in a different set up. Sometimes I might do the odd song, and that’s the way we’ve always worked. Mick might say, "Your rough tape has got the best feel, why don’t you do that one?" But we still work closely on songs. We enjoyed making Some Girls, it was the most immediate album we’d done in ages, and you can’t argue with seven million sales, as far as acceptance goes. I don’t think there’s that much between it and Black & Blue or Goat’s Head Soup. It’s just that suddenly the timing clicks. That’s the thing in this lark, it’s the timing. It could just as easily have bombed. ‘Miss You’ wasn’t specifically recorded as a disco single, it was just another track for Some Girls. ‘Hot Stuff’ was disco-ish too, and so were some others if you want to dig down. All that really matters is that it took off, at the right period in the band’s evolution.
MM: The bass riff on ‘Miss You’ had a lot to do with its success.
KEITH: Bill is leaping ahead. Charlie is so magnificent you expect him to go on getting better, and if it doesn’t get better at a session you sorta moan at him, "Why aren’t you better than last time ‘cos you always are!" Bill tends to go more in cycles, and in the last couple of years I haven’t seen him so happy and playing so well. Something like ‘Miss You’ proves it.
MM: What’s the origin of the Glimmer Twins pseudonym for you and Mick?
KEITH: Glimmer Twins came from the infamous cruise from Lisbon to Rio in Christmas '68 with Mick and Marianne, Anita and myself. We met this very vivacious woman. When she got drunk, all she would ever say was, "Who are you, Won't you give us a glimmer?" I just loved the way she said it, so we became the Glimmer Twins.
MM: Whatever happened to Nanker and Phelge?
KEITH: That included the whole band, it wasn't just me and Mick. Phelge was the name of a guy that lived with us in Edith Grove at World's End, who was one of the most disgusting people that I've ever known. I've forgotten his real name, but he was known as Phelge and he was the sort of guy who would meet you on the stairs of your slum with his streaked Y-fronts on his head, and nothing else, and he'd say: "This is Phelge — welcome home. Unfortunately I haven't made enough money this week to help chip in with the rent, so instead I'll entertain you and be as disgusting as possible for the whole week." He was the sort of guy who would nail up the johnwhile you're in there and lower a tape recorder in through the window and capture the moment when the victim couldn't get the door open. He ended up with a whole reel of tape and every time it got to the bit where they flushed the toilet you'd hear a roar of applause. It was a great tape — unfortunately nobody kept it.
MM: And Nanker, who was he?
KEITH: One of Brian's inventions and deserves to stay with him.
ANITA: (Censored interruption in which she revealed that Brian Jones had once done something very peculiar to a chicken.)
KEiTH: He was always very good with his hands.
MM: Do you still enjoy playing R&B tunes like 'King Bee'?
KEITH: If we have a session suddenly come up, to warm up we do the old Richmond set, just to get the chops together. We do 'Route 66' and 'King Bee'. I'd play you a tape of us jamming, but unfortunately it went up in the Hollywood fire. Don't ask me what happened — I was asleep.
MM: You do seem to have a lot of dramatic events in your life. Do you get the feeling someone is following you around?
KEITH: Mmmmmm... not really. I've had two or three houses burnt down. Redlands burned down once — the roof went with the whole top floor.
MM: That was two fires. What was the third?
KEiTH: Londonderry Hotel. I should have got a medal for that one.
ANITA: Keith! Keith! It's Marlon.
KEITH: Here's my man, he's the one who straightened me out.
(And nine-year-old Mar-ion came in armed with Action Man toys, anxious that the mysterious conference should come to an end and that Dad should take him down to Redlands. Keith and Marlon embraced and the boy turned away from the photographer.)
KEITH: Marlon, now look at the camera.
MARLON: No! (Meanwhile, Anita fixed me with a steely gaze.)
ANITA: Christ you are a star. Ho, ho, ho.
(She mimics my deprecatory mirth. The constant barrage is becoming unnerving, but unfortunately there are no blunt instruments to hand.)
MM: Are the Stones going to play in England this year?
KEITH: We gotta. We gotta play England and Europe this year. Fuck movies. There's nothing concrete, and I can't say when or where. Originally we were going to come to Europe last year, but it was big mouths in Paris that blew the whole deal. We were going to play the Palace, which I like very much. When you read about it they always say it's Paris's attempt at a Studio 54, in fact it's a real theatre and holds about 2,000. In New York they ruined a perfectly good theatre by filling it with faggots in boxing shorts waving champagne bottles in front of your face.
MM: The last time you played in England you got criticised because of the bad sound.
KEITH: Well, when we were playing at Earl's Court it wasn't until the last night they realised that the balcony there was solid steel, behind the plaster, and that's where the weird echo was coming from. It helps a band like Pink Floyd, when you want a very spacey sound, but for a band like us that uses a lot of middle and bottom — forget it, there's no way you can get the Sound across. It just sounds like endless feedback. But I know we were playing good at Earl's Court, and I'm the first to say when we're playing bad, I'll tell ya. I have the tape from Earl's Court and those shows were some of the best on the tour.
MM: Do you still get a kick out of playing?
KEiTH: Look, this is the sort of band that if I didn't get a kick out of it, I would retire the next day. There's nobody in this band you can persuade to do something, unless they wanted to. Charlie hates going on the road, but he likes it enough to still pack his suitcase. He only ever carries a hold-all with a change of clothes in it, because he likes to pretend he's going home the next day.
ANITA: Not like Rod Stewart. His suitcases have got wheels.
KEITH: Rod cancelled that Lyceum show, didn't he? That was a cheap trick. The diplomatic excuse was that the band had got laryngitis. But how many shows can you do with Billy Peek without puking?
MM: Is he that bad, Keith?
KEITH: Oh, maybe that was a bit extreme. But I listened to that single Rod put out, and I look at the peroxide hair, and I like the guy, I always have done, bit I feel like saying: "Now look, cunt, you don't need it." I was just thinking there isn't a band left from when we started that has still got the original line-up, now that Moony has kicked the bucket. Ashes to ashes.
ANITA: That was the best comment of the whole interview.
(The waves of verbal static from Anita increased to such a pitch at this point that Keith was eventually goaded into asking her to vacate the premises, an invitation she gracefully declined. Meanwhile we turned to the barriers in outrage, which have been finally smashed asunder.)
MM: Is it possible for the Rolling Stones to shock people anymore?
ANITA: They can't, they're past it.
KEITH: We never did anything consciously to shock people. All we ever did was answer the call of nature.
ANITA: Oh, gosh.
KEITH: It's true. If you're consciously trying to shock people, you might as well forget it. The comparison between Malcolm McLaren and the Pistols, and Andrew Oldham and the Stones —well, it was just too obvious. Too obvious to work, and it didn't work. I'm sure Johnny Rotten sussed it was a set-up and went along with it, and the others couldn't think of enough swear words to keep it going. "You, you, b-b –bastard."
ANITA: So, they'd got a speech defect, so what.
KEITH: I didn't say they had speech defects, I said they couldn't curse properly.
(Keith discussed further the perils of Sid Vicious, and mentioned that he used to stay at the Chelsea Hotel in New York, where the murder of Nancy Spungen took place.)
KEITH: There was a guy called Zimmerman on the floor above making a fucking row with a guitar all day, and next door there was this Nico with a harmonium, with a hole in her windbag. If you let the maid in to clean your room, everything would be gone. You had to be a certified dealer to get a job as a bellboy.
(Marlon increased his demands to be taken down to Redlands. Keith tottered to-wards the tape machine and played some Stones demos and jams.)
MM: What's the next Stones album going to sound like?
KEITH: You're talking to the wrong man! I'll write it in the studio when we get there. This is all pure bluff.
(Keith disappeared, and for an hour or so we sat listening to Anita chatter gaily about her modelling career. Marlon re-entered the room, announced that Keith had gone to sleep. I found him lying on a bed, Marlon keeping watch. "Goodnight. Keith," I whispered.)
© Chris Welch, 1979